Choosing an effective embedded SoC ASIC design strategy
Sunit Bansal, Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
EETimes (12/13/2010 8:18 PM EST)
In large and complex system-0n-chip ASIC design, two of the most challenging tasks are those involving design closure, timing routing and power.
It is a tedious task to converge on timing and routing, owing to the limitations of design size and the memory-intensive calculations. Essentially, it is dependent on the design size that an EDA tool can handle.
In such cases, it is advisable to go for a hierarchical approach instead of a flat top. Generally, the blocks are demarcated on the basis of functionality, backward compatibility, third party IP etc.
This article details the difference in terms of runtimes, routing congestion, timing summary and utilization for a design that is done as hierarchical vs. the same design using the flat approach.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 8MHz / 40MHz Pierce Oscillator - X-FAB XT018-0.18µm
- UCIe RX Interface
- Very Low Latency BCH Codec
- 5G-NTN Modem IP for Satellite User Terminals
- 400G UDP/IP Hardware Protocol Stack
Related Articles
- Optimize SoC Design with a Network-on-Chip Strategy
- FPGA to ASIC Strategy for Communication SoC Designs
- An Efficient Device for Forward Collision Warning Using Low Cost Stereo Camera & Embedded SoC
- Testing Of Repairable Embedded Memories in SoC: Approach and Challenges
Latest Articles
- SNAP-V: A RISC-V SoC with Configurable Neuromorphic Acceleration for Small-Scale Spiking Neural Networks
- An FPGA Implementation of Displacement Vector Search for Intra Pattern Copy in JPEG XS
- A Persistent-State Dataflow Accelerator for Memory-Bound Linear Attention Decode on FPGA
- VMXDOTP: A RISC-V Vector ISA Extension for Efficient Microscaling (MX) Format Acceleration
- PDF: PUF-based DNN Fingerprinting for Knowledge Distillation Traceability