Choosing an effective embedded SoC ASIC design strategy
Sunit Bansal, Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
EETimes (12/13/2010 8:18 PM EST)
In large and complex system-0n-chip ASIC design, two of the most challenging tasks are those involving design closure, timing routing and power.
It is a tedious task to converge on timing and routing, owing to the limitations of design size and the memory-intensive calculations. Essentially, it is dependent on the design size that an EDA tool can handle.
In such cases, it is advisable to go for a hierarchical approach instead of a flat top. Generally, the blocks are demarcated on the basis of functionality, backward compatibility, third party IP etc.
This article details the difference in terms of runtimes, routing congestion, timing summary and utilization for a design that is done as hierarchical vs. the same design using the flat approach.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
- MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
- ASIL B Compliant MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
Related Articles
- Optimize SoC Design with a Network-on-Chip Strategy
- FPGA to ASIC Strategy for Communication SoC Designs
- An Efficient Device for Forward Collision Warning Using Low Cost Stereo Camera & Embedded SoC
- Testing Of Repairable Embedded Memories in SoC: Approach and Challenges
Latest Articles
- RISC-V Functional Safety for Autonomous Automotive Systems: An Analytical Framework and Research Roadmap for ML-Assisted Certification
- Emulation-based System-on-Chip Security Verification: Challenges and Opportunities
- A 129FPS Full HD Real-Time Accelerator for 3D Gaussian Splatting
- SkipOPU: An FPGA-based Overlay Processor for Large Language Models with Dynamically Allocated Computation
- TensorPool: A 3D-Stacked 8.4TFLOPS/4.3W Many-Core Domain-Specific Processor for AI-Native Radio Access Networks