Modeling and Optimizing Performance Bottlenecks for Neuromorphic Accelerators

By Jason Yik ^∗, Walter Gallego Gomez ^†, Andrew Cheng ^∗, Benedetto Leto ^†, Alessandro Pierro ^‡§, Noah Pacik-Nelson ^¶∥, Korneel Van den Berghe ^∗∗, Vittorio Fra ^†, Andreea Danielescu ^¶††, Gianvito Urgese ^†, Vijay Janapa Reddi ^∗
∗ Harvard University, ^† Politecnico di Torino, ^‡ Intel, ^§ LMU Munich, ^¶ Accenture Labs, ^∥ BootLoop AI, ^∗∗ TU Delft , ^†† Wordly

Abstract

Neuromorphic accelerators offer promising platforms for machine learning (ML) inference by leveraging event-driven, spatially-expanded architectures that naturally exploit unstructured sparsity through co-located memory and compute. However, their unique architectural characteristics create performance dynamics that differ fundamentally from conventional accelerators. Existing workload optimization approaches for neuromorphic accelerators rely on aggregate network-wide sparsity and operation counting, but the extent to which these metrics actually improve deployed performance remains unknown. This paper presents the first comprehensive performance bound and bottleneck analysis of neuromorphic accelerators, revealing the shortcomings of the conventional metrics and offering an understanding of what facets matter for workload performance. We present both theoretical analytical modeling and extensive empirical characterization of three real neuromorphic accelerators: Brainchip AKD1000, Synsense Speck, and Intel Loihi 2. From these, we establish three distinct accelerator bottleneck states, memory-bound, compute-bound, and traffic-bound, and identify which workload configuration features are likely to exhibit these bottleneck states. We synthesize all of our insights into the floorline performance model, a visual model that identifies performance bounds and informs how to optimize a given workload, based on its position on the model. Finally, we present an optimization methodology that combines sparsity-aware training with floorline-informed partitioning. Our methodology achieves substantial performance improvements at iso-accuracy: up to 3.86x runtime improvement and 3.38x energy reduction compared to prior manually-tuned configurations.

To read the full article, click here