Basics of multi-cycle & false paths
Nitin Singh, Neha Agarwal,Arjun Pal Chowdhury (Freescale Semiconductor)
EDN (August 07, 2014)
One of the significant challenges to RTL designers is to identify complete timing exceptions upfront. This becomes an iterative process in complicated designs where additional timing exceptions are identified based upon critical path or failing path analysis from timing reports. This approach leaves a significant number of timing paths which may not be real, but these never get identified, since they may not come up in the critical path report. However, synthesis and timing tools will continue to expend resources optimizing these paths when it is not needed. At the same time, it can also impact area and power consumption of the device.
The intent of this document is to provide examples of false and multi cycle path exceptions that are easily missed by even experienced designers, and are identified through iterations on timing reports.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- 1G BASE-T Ethernet Verification IP
- Network-on-Chip (NoC)
- Microsecond Channel (MSC/MSC-Plus) Controller
- 12-bit, 400 MSPS SAR ADC - TSMC 12nm FFC
Related Articles
- Basics of SRAM PUF and how to deploy it for IoT security
- Memory Prefetching Evaluation of Scientific Applications on a Modern HPC Arm-Based Processor
- Ramping Up Open-Source RISC-V Cores: Assessing the Energy Efficiency of Superscalar, Out-of-Order Execution
- From I2C to I3C: Evolution of Two-Wire Communication in Embedded Systems
Latest Articles
- Extending and Accelerating Inner Product Masking with Fault Detection via Instruction Set Extension
- ioPUF+: A PUF Based on I/O Pull-Up/Down Resistors for Secret Key Generation in IoT Nodes
- In-Situ Encryption of Single-Transistor Nonvolatile Memories without Density Loss
- David vs. Goliath: Can Small Models Win Big with Agentic AI in Hardware Design?
- RoMe: Row Granularity Access Memory System for Large Language Models