Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, SATA... the winners and losers in 2012
January 9, 2013
Who makes the decision and declare that a specific interface protocol is successful? Not me, as I can only consolidate market share data and some insight information coming from the industry. The end user, when going to a shop (real or virtual) and spend a significant part of his budget to buy an electronic product, selecting among hundreds, will eventually decide for the success of a certain feature (SuperSpeed USB, HDMI or ThunderBolt). But, if you wait for the success of this feature on the mainstream market to integrate it into your system (OEM), your SoC (chip maker) or your IP portfolio (EDA/IP vendor), then you are respectively 12/18 months, 2 years or more late…
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- USB3.0 PHY
- USB3.0 PHY on GF22FDX and Samsung 28nm FDSOI
- USB3.0 build-in clock PHY, SMIC 110g
- USB3.0 build-in clock PHY, SMIC 55LL
- USB3.0 build-in clock PHY, SMIC 40LP, type-C
Related Blogs
- Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, DDRn... the winner and losers in 2013
- Navigating the Complexity of Address Translation Verification in PCI Express 6.0
- Interface Protocols, USB3, HDMI, MIPI... the winner and losers in 2011
- According with Cadence, PCI Express gen-3, to be the PCIe solution for the mainstream market as soon as in 2012
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Announces Industry's First Verification IP for Embedded USB2v2 (eUSB2v2)
- The Industry’s First USB4 Device IP Certification Will Speed Innovation and Edge AI Enablement
- Understanding Extended Metadata in CXL 3.1: What It Means for Your Systems
- 2025 Outlook with Mahesh Tirupattur of Analog Bits
- eUSB2 Version 2 with 4.8Gbps and the Use Cases: A Comprehensive Overview