Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, SATA... the winners and losers in 2012
January 9, 2013
Who makes the decision and declare that a specific interface protocol is successful? Not me, as I can only consolidate market share data and some insight information coming from the industry. The end user, when going to a shop (real or virtual) and spend a significant part of his budget to buy an electronic product, selecting among hundreds, will eventually decide for the success of a certain feature (SuperSpeed USB, HDMI or ThunderBolt). But, if you wait for the success of this feature on the mainstream market to integrate it into your system (OEM), your SoC (chip maker) or your IP portfolio (EDA/IP vendor), then you are respectively 12/18 months, 2 years or more late…
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- USB3.2 PHY & Controller
- USB3.1 transceiver IP with PMA and PCS layer
- USB3.x OTG IIP
- USB3.x HUB IIP
- USB3.x HOST IIP
Related Blogs
- Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, DDRn... the winner and losers in 2013
- Interface Protocols, USB3, HDMI, MIPI... the winner and losers in 2011
- According with Cadence, PCI Express gen-3, to be the PCIe solution for the mainstream market as soon as in 2012
- MIPI UniPro through eyes of PCI Express
Latest Blogs
- lowRISC Tackles Post-Quantum Cryptography Challenges through Research Collaborations
- How to Solve the Size, Weight, Power and Cooling Challenge in Radar & Radio Frequency Modulation Classification
- Programmable Hardware Delivers 10,000X Improvement in Verification Speed over Software for Forward Error Correction
- The Integrated Design Challenge: Developing Chip, Software, and System in Unison
- Introducing Mi-V RV32 v4.0 Soft Processor: Enhanced RISC-V Power