Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, SATA... the winners and losers in 2012
January 9, 2013
Who makes the decision and declare that a specific interface protocol is successful? Not me, as I can only consolidate market share data and some insight information coming from the industry. The end user, when going to a shop (real or virtual) and spend a significant part of his budget to buy an electronic product, selecting among hundreds, will eventually decide for the success of a certain feature (SuperSpeed USB, HDMI or ThunderBolt). But, if you wait for the success of this feature on the mainstream market to integrate it into your system (OEM), your SoC (chip maker) or your IP portfolio (EDA/IP vendor), then you are respectively 12/18 months, 2 years or more late…
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Super-speed USB3.0 Device Controller
- Super-Speed USB3.0 Hub Controller
- USB3.2 PHY & Controller
- USB3.1 transceiver IP with PMA and PCS layer
- USB3.x OTG IIP
Related Blogs
- Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, DDRn... the winner and losers in 2013
- Interface Protocols, USB3, HDMI, MIPI... the winner and losers in 2011
- According with Cadence, PCI Express gen-3, to be the PCIe solution for the mainstream market as soon as in 2012
- MIPI UniPro through eyes of PCI Express
Latest Blogs
- How is RISC-V’s open and customizable design changing embedded systems?
- Imagination GPUs now support Vulkan 1.4 and Android 16
- From "What-If" to "What-Is": Cadence IP Validation for Silicon Platform Success
- Accelerating RTL Design with Agentic AI: A Multi-Agent LLM-Driven Approach
- UEC-CBFC: Credit-Based Flow Control for Next-Gen Ethernet in AI and HPC