The Increasing Role of SystemC in System Design
February 23, 2011
Today's post is less technical and a bit more theoretical, but I promise that my next post will be more hands-on.
As somebody working on virtual platforms in an EDA company, I regularly spend time talking to firmware and embedded software engineers with many different backgrounds. Every so often one of them asks, "Why SystemC?" Some software engineers look at SystemC and decide that it looks like a real mess. They mention things like:
- SystemC has complex classes built with C++
- It uses strange macros like SC_MODULE, SC_METHOD, and SC_HAS_PROCESS
- Sometimes it can be difficult to find the cause of compilation errors
- SystemC takes a long time to compile
- Generally it doesn't provide much benefit for all this complexity
They ask, "what is wrong with plain C++ or even plain old C?" Most of the time they ask these questions because they don't understand how everything fits together.
Related Semiconductor IP
- AES GCM IP Core
- High Speed Ethernet Quad 10G to 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet Gen-2 Quad 100G PCS IP
- High Speed Ethernet 4/2/1-Lane 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet 2/4/8-Lane 200G/400G PCS
Related Blogs
- Can the Semiconductor Industry Overcome Thermal Design Challenges in Multi-Die Systems?
- Rob Aitken of ARM Research on System Design
- Design IP Sales Grew 19.4% in 2021, confirm 2016-2021 CAGR of 9.8%
- Design for differentiation: architecture licenses in RISC-V
Latest Blogs
- Why Choose Hard IP for Embedded FPGA in Aerospace and Defense Applications
- Migrating the CPU IP Development from MIPS to RISC-V Instruction Set Architecture
- Quintauris: Accelerating RISC-V Innovation for next-gen Hardware
- Say Goodbye to Limits and Hello to Freedom of Scalability in the MIPS P8700
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?