The Increasingly Hazardous World of FPGA Verification
Last week saw the publication of two interesting blog posts regarding the growing challenges of FPGA verification, first from my buddy Dave Orecchio over at GateRocket and then from my Cadence colleague Steve Leibson. Both posts made the point that FPGA developers are increasingly facing the same verification issues as developers of non-programmable devices. This trend has been evident for quite a few years, but the number of FPGA users affected has grown from a tiny fraction to an entire upper tier of developers whose design size and complexity rival or even surpass many ASIC and SoC projects.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- P1619 / 802.1ae (MACSec) GCM/XTS/CBC-AES Core
- LPDDR6/5X/5 Controller IP
- Post-Quantum ML-KEM IP Core
Related Blogs
- The interface makes the FPGA
- Altera's intros 28nm Stratix V FPGA family
- Xilinx unleashes triad of low-power, 28nm FPGA families with very promising characteristics for memory interfacing
- Will verification challenges overwhelm FPGA design?
Latest Blogs
- ML-DSA explained: Quantum-Safe digital Signatures for secure embedded Systems
- Efficiency Defines The Future Of Data Movement
- Why Standard-Cell Architecture Matters for Adaptable ASIC Designs
- ML-KEM explained: Quantum-safe Key Exchange for secure embedded Hardware
- Rivos Collaborates to Complete Secure Provisioning of Integrated OpenTitan Root of Trust During SoC Production