What will it take for FPGAs to become as ubiquitous as processors?
The inspiration for this blog came from an article I read recently that talked about the rising number of FPGA design starts, the falling number of ASIC design starts, and the impact that this is having on the EDA industry.
It also pointed out that FPGAs still account for only a tiny fraction of the semiconductor revenues, so I thought I would add my own 2 cents to this discussion, not by regurgitating the data that has already been put out there, but to look at why FPGAs have not become as prevalent as the ever so humble microprocessor.
Let’s look at the microprocessor. It is a very inefficient device for almost every task. It is slow, it consumes a lot of power per unit of computation, and it is also one of the largest possible implementations in terms of chip size to perform the desired functions (bears a lot of similarity to the negative aspects of the FPGA, except that the FPGA is better on almost all counts). So why on earth did this device ever become so popular? I think it comes down to a few simple reasons – simplicity, independence, and abstraction. Let me explain what I mean by each of those and point out why the FPGAs at the moment do not meet the necessary expectations.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- xSPI Multiple Bus Memory Controller
- MIPI CSI-2 IP
- PCIe Gen 7 Verification IP
- WIFI 2.4G/5G Low Power Wakeup Radio IP
- Radar IP
Related Blogs
- The interface makes the FPGA
- what made Apple design the A4 processor?
- Altera's intros 28nm Stratix V FPGA family
- Android Outsells iPhones, Opens Processor Market
Latest Blogs
- The Growing Importance of PVT Monitoring for Silicon Lifecycle Management
- Unlock early software development for custom RISC-V designs with faster simulation
- HBM4 Boosts Memory Performance for AI Training
- Using AI to Accelerate Chip Design: Dynamic, Adaptive Flows
- Locking When Emulating Xtensa LX Multi-Core on a Xilinx FPGA