Speed up communications standards development
Mike Woodward, The MathWorks
Nov 03, 2005 (5:00 AM)
CommsDesign
Developing communications standards is an increasingly difficult task. Due to the cost, complexity and specialized knowledge needed, today's standards are usually developed using a consortium approach, one that often adds to development problems. Driven by several factors, this approach to standards development has been used since the late 1980s. Complexity is a key factor, both at the system and algorithm levels.
Each new generation of standards is at least an order of magnitude more complex than its predecessor. As a result, the cost of developing standards has increased, in most cases, beyond the level that an individual company would be comfortable shouldering. The growing size and complexity of standards also means that more companies are needed to provide the specialized skills required. Because international markets are now a target of most standards, involving companies from different countries helps with regulatory and market acceptance.
By its very nature, standards development requires a nimble approach; every time the standard consortium adopts a change, models must be updated and re-run. More partners in the consortium can mean more changes.
The traditional approach to standards development, using C models, is ill-suited for this kind of rapid and iterative development. Model-based design provides an alternative method of modeling communications standards with hierarchical, block-based models that drastically reduces the time required to make modifications.
Nov 03, 2005 (5:00 AM)
CommsDesign
Developing communications standards is an increasingly difficult task. Due to the cost, complexity and specialized knowledge needed, today's standards are usually developed using a consortium approach, one that often adds to development problems. Driven by several factors, this approach to standards development has been used since the late 1980s. Complexity is a key factor, both at the system and algorithm levels.
Each new generation of standards is at least an order of magnitude more complex than its predecessor. As a result, the cost of developing standards has increased, in most cases, beyond the level that an individual company would be comfortable shouldering. The growing size and complexity of standards also means that more companies are needed to provide the specialized skills required. Because international markets are now a target of most standards, involving companies from different countries helps with regulatory and market acceptance.
By its very nature, standards development requires a nimble approach; every time the standard consortium adopts a change, models must be updated and re-run. More partners in the consortium can mean more changes.
The traditional approach to standards development, using C models, is ill-suited for this kind of rapid and iterative development. Model-based design provides an alternative method of modeling communications standards with hierarchical, block-based models that drastically reduces the time required to make modifications.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 8MHz / 40MHz Pierce Oscillator - X-FAB XT018-0.18µm
- UCIe RX Interface
- Very Low Latency BCH Codec
- 5G-NTN Modem IP for Satellite User Terminals
- 400G UDP/IP Hardware Protocol Stack
Related Articles
- Testable SoCs : Test flow speeds up MP3 decoder development to eight weeks
- Reconfiguring Design -> FPGAs speed audio application development
- DSP hardware extensions speed up 3G wireless multimedia
- Embedded multicore needs communications standards
Latest Articles
- SNAP-V: A RISC-V SoC with Configurable Neuromorphic Acceleration for Small-Scale Spiking Neural Networks
- An FPGA Implementation of Displacement Vector Search for Intra Pattern Copy in JPEG XS
- A Persistent-State Dataflow Accelerator for Memory-Bound Linear Attention Decode on FPGA
- VMXDOTP: A RISC-V Vector ISA Extension for Efficient Microscaling (MX) Format Acceleration
- PDF: PUF-based DNN Fingerprinting for Knowledge Distillation Traceability