Commentary: ESL should drive emulation
Shiv Tasker from Bluespec Inc. and Lauro Rizzatti from EVE USA.
(04/13/2007 3:07 PM EDT), EE Times
Conventional wisdom says that when it comes to design, you can either have a design that simulates quickly, but is not accurate. Or, you can have one that is hardware accurate but runs far too slowly for meaningful software debug or architectural performance analysis.
There are hardware acceleration-based techniques that range from off-the-shelf field programmable gate array (FPGA) boards to emulation platforms and multi-million dollar hardware accelerators that can take a detailed hardware implementation and speed up its execution. All require a register transfer level (RTL) representation of the design, which, of course, brings in a new consideration — the time and cost that it takes to develop an RTL model.
While it is relatively inexpensive and quick to develop a functional model, it is time and resource consuming to develop RTL code. These models cannot be developed in a timely fashion to affect design decisions. Further, as software becomes more of a bottleneck to shipping a product, there is a huge need for a platform on which one can begin software testing earlier in the development process.
(04/13/2007 3:07 PM EDT), EE Times
Conventional wisdom says that when it comes to design, you can either have a design that simulates quickly, but is not accurate. Or, you can have one that is hardware accurate but runs far too slowly for meaningful software debug or architectural performance analysis.
There are hardware acceleration-based techniques that range from off-the-shelf field programmable gate array (FPGA) boards to emulation platforms and multi-million dollar hardware accelerators that can take a detailed hardware implementation and speed up its execution. All require a register transfer level (RTL) representation of the design, which, of course, brings in a new consideration — the time and cost that it takes to develop an RTL model.
While it is relatively inexpensive and quick to develop a functional model, it is time and resource consuming to develop RTL code. These models cannot be developed in a timely fashion to affect design decisions. Further, as software becomes more of a bottleneck to shipping a product, there is a huge need for a platform on which one can begin software testing earlier in the development process.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
Related News
- Commentary: Why it's time to redefine ESL
- Commentary: ESL success demands outsourcing
- Commentary: How ESL can regain credibility
- Commentary: ANSI C won't work for ESL
Latest News
- Weebit Nano secures a license agreement with Texas Instruments
- Digital Blocks DB9000 Display Controller IP Core Family Extends Leadership in 8K, Automotive, Medical, Aerospace, and Industrial SoC Designs
- AI Directs UFS Advancement
- Qualitas Semiconductor Expands Automotive Momentum with 5nm IP Bundle Agreement
- Cyient Semiconductors Acquires Majority Stake in Kinetic Technologies to Drive Custom Power IC Leadership for Edge AI and High-Performance Compute Markets