Commentary: ANSI C won't work for ESL
Mike Meredith, Forte Design Systems
(05/10/2007 2:36 PM EDT), EE Times
While SystemC has been accepted by most systems, semiconductor, and EDA companies as the language of choice for high-speed system-level modeling, there is a continued debate over which language is best for electronic system level (ESL) synthesis.
Some prefer ANSI C or C++. They argue that the breadth of algorithmic software available in these languages and the large numbers of people familiar with them make them a natural fit for synthesizing hardware implementations from high-level algorithmic descriptions.
These arguments have some merit, and at first blush the prospect of re-using existing software source code for hardware implementation looks fast and easy. Unfortunately, hardware designers attempting this while continuing to meet the challenging power consumption, silicon area, and performance demands of today's high-volume consumer oriented systems-on-chip will encounter two intractable problems. Source code optimized for execution on a processor is unsuitable for direct hardware implementation, and C and C++ have a fundamental inability to express constructs that are necessary for effective hardware design.
(05/10/2007 2:36 PM EDT), EE Times
While SystemC has been accepted by most systems, semiconductor, and EDA companies as the language of choice for high-speed system-level modeling, there is a continued debate over which language is best for electronic system level (ESL) synthesis.
Some prefer ANSI C or C++. They argue that the breadth of algorithmic software available in these languages and the large numbers of people familiar with them make them a natural fit for synthesizing hardware implementations from high-level algorithmic descriptions.
These arguments have some merit, and at first blush the prospect of re-using existing software source code for hardware implementation looks fast and easy. Unfortunately, hardware designers attempting this while continuing to meet the challenging power consumption, silicon area, and performance demands of today's high-volume consumer oriented systems-on-chip will encounter two intractable problems. Source code optimized for execution on a processor is unsuitable for direct hardware implementation, and C and C++ have a fundamental inability to express constructs that are necessary for effective hardware design.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
- MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
- ASIL B Compliant MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
Related News
- ESL needs more work, panelists say
- Mentor Graphics Introduces Catapult SL, the First High-Level Synthesis Tool to Create High-Performance Subsystems from Pure ANSI C++
- Commentary: Why it's time to redefine ESL
- Commentary: ESL success demands outsourcing
Latest News
- GUC Announces 3nm 12 Gbps HBM4 PHY and Controller
- Arasan acheives the Industry's First ASIL-D Certification for its CAN XL IP Core
- Quintauris and Elektrobit Partner to Enable Reliable RISC-V Solutions for Automotive
- Wind River Joins the CHERI Alliance and Collaborates with Innovate UK to Accelerate Cybersecurity Innovation
- Arteris and MIPS Partner to Accelerate Development for Physical AI Platforms