Why Intel 14nm is NOT a Game Changer!
On one hand the Motley Fool is saying, “Intel 14nm could change the game” and on the other hand the Wall Street Cheat Sheet is saying, “Intel should shut down mobile”. SemiWiki says Intel missed mobile and should look to the future and focus on wearables and in this blog I will argue why.
Let’s look back to 2009 when Intel and TSMC signed an agreement to “collaborate on addressing technology platform, intellectual property (IP) infrastructure, and System-on-Chip (SoC) solutions.” Intel and TSMC ported the Atom Core to 40nm and offered it to more than 1,000 of TSMC’s customers:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- General use, integer-N 4GHz Hybrid Phase Locked Loop on TSMC 28HPC
- RAM 8b, 16b, and 32b data widths - TSMC 180nm
- 1.2GHz General Purpose PLL for TSMC 0.18u Processes
- General Purpose PLL for TSMC 180nm
- Integrated Oscillator - TSMC 180n
Related Blogs
- Why IMG CXT ray tracing is a game-changer for mobile
- Processor architecture optimization is not a barrier for university researchers
- Why eMMC is still a good low-budget storage option?
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?