Why Intel 14nm is NOT a Game Changer!
February 3, 2014
On one hand the Motley Fool is saying, “Intel 14nm could change the game” and on the other hand the Wall Street Cheat Sheet is saying, “Intel should shut down mobile”. SemiWiki says Intel missed mobile and should look to the future and focus on wearables and in this blog I will argue why.
Let’s look back to 2009 when Intel and TSMC signed an agreement to “collaborate on addressing technology platform, intellectual property (IP) infrastructure, and System-on-Chip (SoC) solutions.” Intel and TSMC ported the Atom Core to 40nm and offered it to more than 1,000 of TSMC’s customers:
Related Semiconductor IP
- 112G PHY, TSMC N7 x4, North/South (vertical) poly orientation
- 112G Ethernet PHY, TSMC N7 x4, North/South (vertical) poly orientation
- 112G Ethernet PHY, TSMC N7 x2, North/South (vertical) poly orientation
- 112G Ethernet PHY, TSMC N7 x1, North/South (vertical) poly orientation
- 112G Ethernet PHY, TSMC N6 x2, North/South (vertical) poly orientation
Related Blogs
- Why IMG CXT ray tracing is a game-changer for mobile
- Processor architecture optimization is not a barrier for university researchers
- Why eMMC is still a good low-budget storage option?
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?
Latest Blogs
- Why Choose Hard IP for Embedded FPGA in Aerospace and Defense Applications
- Migrating the CPU IP Development from MIPS to RISC-V Instruction Set Architecture
- Quintauris: Accelerating RISC-V Innovation for next-gen Hardware
- Say Goodbye to Limits and Hello to Freedom of Scalability in the MIPS P8700
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?