Why Intel 14nm is NOT a Game Changer!
February 3, 2014
On one hand the Motley Fool is saying, “Intel 14nm could change the game” and on the other hand the Wall Street Cheat Sheet is saying, “Intel should shut down mobile”. SemiWiki says Intel missed mobile and should look to the future and focus on wearables and in this blog I will argue why.
Let’s look back to 2009 when Intel and TSMC signed an agreement to “collaborate on addressing technology platform, intellectual property (IP) infrastructure, and System-on-Chip (SoC) solutions.” Intel and TSMC ported the Atom Core to 40nm and offered it to more than 1,000 of TSMC’s customers:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- 12-bit, 400 MSPS SAR ADC - TSMC 12nm FFC
- General use, integer-N 4GHz Hybrid Phase Locked Loop on TSMC 28HPC
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- 25MHz to 4.0GHz Fractional-N RC PLL Synthesizer on TSMC 3nm N3P
Related Blogs
- Why eMMC is still a good low-budget storage option?
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?
- USB4 Sideband Channel Is Not a Side Business
- Why IMG CXT ray tracing is a game-changer for mobile
Latest Blogs
- ReRAM in Automotive SoCs: When Every Nanosecond Counts
- AndeSentry – Andes’ Security Platform
- Formally verifying AVX2 rejection sampling for ML-KEM
- Integrating PQC into StrongSwan: ML-KEM integration for IPsec/IKEv2
- Breaking the Bandwidth Barrier: Enabling Celestial AI’s Photonic Fabric™ with Custom ESD IP on TSMC’s 5nm Platform