What Does SystemC Mean for Design and Verification?
August 23, 2011
My colleague Jack Erickson recently published in the Cadence System Design and Verification Community a blog post entitled "IP Cannot Be an Efficient Abstraction Level without SystemC!" When I saw the title, my immediate reaction was to write a complementary post called "SystemC Cannot Be an Efficient Abstraction Level without IP!" This caused me to think some about the industry momentum toward using SystemC rather than traditional RTL as a design language. I chose a more general title because there are three key points I want to hit.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 Controller IP
- Post-Quantum ML-KEM IP Core
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Manager IP
Related Blogs
- Randomization considerations for PCIe Integrity and Data Encryption Verification Challenges
- Smarter SoC Design for Agile Teams and Tight Deadlines
- Verification of UALink (UAL) and Ultra Ethernet (UEC) Protocols for Scalable HPC/AI Networks using Synopsys VIP
- Verification of the Lane Adapter FSM of a USB4 Router Design Is Not Simple
Latest Blogs
- ML-DSA explained: Quantum-Safe digital Signatures for secure embedded Systems
- Efficiency Defines The Future Of Data Movement
- Why Standard-Cell Architecture Matters for Adaptable ASIC Designs
- ML-KEM explained: Quantum-safe Key Exchange for secure embedded Hardware
- Rivos Collaborates to Complete Secure Provisioning of Integrated OpenTitan Root of Trust During SoC Production