Neural Network Efficiency with Embedded FPGA's
The traditional metrics for evaluating IP are performance, power, and area, commonly abbreviated as PPA. Viewed independently, PPA measures can be difficult to assess. As an example, design constraints that are purely based on performance, without concern for the associated power dissipation and circuit area, are increasingly rare. There is a related set of characteristics of importance, especially given the increasing integration of SoC circuitry associated with deep neural networks (DNN) – namely, the implementation energy and area efficiency, usually represented as a performance per watt measure and a performance per area measure.
The DNN implementation options commonly considered are: a software-programmed (general purpose) microprocessor core, a programmed graphics processing unit (GPU), a field-programmable gate array, and a hard-wired logic block. In 2002, Broderson and Zhang from UC-Berkeley published a Technical Report that described the efficiency of different options, targeting digital signal processing algorithms. [1]
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
- AGILEX 7 R-Tile Gen5 NVMe Host IP
- 100G PAM4 Serdes PHY - 14nm
- Bluetooth Low Energy Subsystem IP
- Multi-core capable 64-bit RISC-V CPU with vector extensions
Related Blogs
- Embedded Vision: The Road Ahead for Neural Networks and Five Likely Surprises
- FPGAs take on convolutional neural networks
- Synopsys Fields Processor Core for Neural Network Computer Vision Applications
- Reconfigurable redefined with embedded FPGA core IP
Latest Blogs
- From guesswork to guidance: Mastering processor co-design with Codasip Exploration Framework
- Enabling AI Innovation at The Far Edge
- Unleashing Leading On-Device AI Performance and Efficiency with New Arm C1 CPU Cluster
- The Perfect Solution for Local AI
- UA Link vs Interlaken: What you need to know about the right protocol for AI and HPC interconnect fabrics