EDA: Not Like Semiconductor Equipment
It was SEMICON China last week, and I've written a couple of posts about it this week. Talking about semiconductor manufacturing equipment a lot recently reminded me of a friend who used to work in the semiconductor equipment industry (and I did some consulting for him years ago). When I was having lunch with him, we got to discussing why EDA and semiconductor equipment sales processes are so different.
At first glance, there are a lot of parallels between semiconductor equipment and EDA. Most notably: many of the same customers, the same technology treadmill, and a small number of large suppliers. There is also not a huge amount of differentiation in the product offerings, at least in terms that are easily assessed by the customer. To a first approximation, all plasma etchers etch, and all Verilog simulators simulate Verilog. A better assessment requires deciding more precisely what you want to do, and then running detailed tests.
But there are also big differences, the two big ones being lead time and cost.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Root of Trust (RoT)
- Fixed Point Doppler Channel IP core
- Multi-protocol wireless plaform integrating Bluetooth Dual Mode, IEEE 802.15.4 (for Thread, Zigbee and Matter)
- Polyphase Video Scaler
- Compact, low-power, 8bit ADC on GF 22nm FDX
Related Blogs
- What will EDA and chip design look like in the year 2020? Prognostications from the ICCAD panel
- Should More Semiconductor, EDA Startups Look to Kickstarter?
- Special Report: Buying And Selling EDA Companies
- When Is a Subsystem Not Like an IP?
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Announces Industry's First Verification IP for Embedded USB2v2 (eUSB2v2)
- The Industry’s First USB4 Device IP Certification Will Speed Innovation and Edge AI Enablement
- Understanding Extended Metadata in CXL 3.1: What It Means for Your Systems
- 2025 Outlook with Mahesh Tirupattur of Analog Bits
- eUSB2 Version 2 with 4.8Gbps and the Use Cases: A Comprehensive Overview