Do Chips Really Work The First Time?
There’s no longer survey data on respins, but there are certainly a lot of new problems to contend with—and some new ways of looking at those problems.
The industry used to have survey data that showed the number of respins required for a broad swath of designs and the principle causes of those respins. That was a good indicator of where tools or processes needed to be improved. At the time, the data showed that the primary cause of respins was functional errors, and since then EDA vendors have been beefing up tools in that area.
Most of the available data is now 10 years old and new data does not appear to be forthcoming. Perhaps the data is so valuable that it doesn’t get circulated, or perhaps nobody is willing to admit their chips are not perfect the first time around, even though surveys are anonymous.
Related Semiconductor IP
- ReRAM NVM in DB HiTek 130nm BCD
- UFS 5.0 Host Controller IP
- PDM Receiver/PDM-to-PCM Converter
- Voltage and Temperature Sensor with integrated ADC - GlobalFoundries® 22FDX®
- 8MHz / 40MHz Pierce Oscillator - X-FAB XT018-0.18µm
Related Blogs
- The 20-nm eyes have it right first time!
- Do You Really Know RapidIO?
- Do You Really Want Zero Test Costs?
- What NoCs with virtual channels really do for SoCs
Latest Blogs
- Announcing Arm AGI CPU: The silicon foundation for the agentic AI cloud era
- Tapeout Predictability with Hardened eFPGA IP Blocks
- Tape-out Risk in the Age of Edge AI: The Case for GPU IP
- PQShield Collaborates with pQCee
- Advancing In-Memory Computing: A Global Effort to Build More Efficient AI Hardware