Do Chips Really Work The First Time?
There’s no longer survey data on respins, but there are certainly a lot of new problems to contend with—and some new ways of looking at those problems.
The industry used to have survey data that showed the number of respins required for a broad swath of designs and the principle causes of those respins. That was a good indicator of where tools or processes needed to be improved. At the time, the data showed that the primary cause of respins was functional errors, and since then EDA vendors have been beefing up tools in that area.
Most of the available data is now 10 years old and new data does not appear to be forthcoming. Perhaps the data is so valuable that it doesn’t get circulated, or perhaps nobody is willing to admit their chips are not perfect the first time around, even though surveys are anonymous.
Related Semiconductor IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
- ASIL B Compliant MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
- SHA-256 Secure Hash Algorithm IP Core
- EdDSA Curve25519 signature generation engine
Related Blogs
- The 20-nm eyes have it right first time!
- Do You Really Know RapidIO?
- Do You Really Want Zero Test Costs?
- What NoCs with virtual channels really do for SoCs
Latest Blogs
- The Architectural Evolution of 16GHz PLLs for Next-Gen AI and SerDes SoCs
- Considerations When Architecting Your Next SoC: NoCs with Arteris
- Implementing Dual-core Lockstep in the CHIPS Alliance VeeR EL2 RISC-V core for safety-critical applications
- Rethinking Display Safety: Why RISC-V-Supervised DisplayPort Subsystems Enable Secure, Isolated Automotive Architectures
- Area, Pipelining, Integration: A Comparison of SHA-2 and SHA-3 for embedded Systems.