Do Chips Really Work The First Time?
There’s no longer survey data on respins, but there are certainly a lot of new problems to contend with—and some new ways of looking at those problems.
The industry used to have survey data that showed the number of respins required for a broad swath of designs and the principle causes of those respins. That was a good indicator of where tools or processes needed to be improved. At the time, the data showed that the primary cause of respins was functional errors, and since then EDA vendors have been beefing up tools in that area.
Most of the available data is now 10 years old and new data does not appear to be forthcoming. Perhaps the data is so valuable that it doesn’t get circulated, or perhaps nobody is willing to admit their chips are not perfect the first time around, even though surveys are anonymous.
Related Semiconductor IP
- ISO/IEC 7816 Verification IP
- 50MHz to 800MHz Integer-N RC Phase-Locked Loop on SMIC 55nm LL
- Simulation VIP for AMBA CHI-C2C
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
Related Blogs
- The 20-nm eyes have it right first time!
- Do You Really Know RapidIO?
- Do You Really Want Zero Test Costs?
- What NoCs with virtual channels really do for SoCs
Latest Blogs
- Automotive Ethernet with Comcores – Safety, Quality and ASIL certification of IP
- A Comparison on Different AMBA 5 CHI Verification IPs
- Cadence Recognized as TSMC OIP Partner of the Year at 2025 OIP Ecosystem Forum
- Accelerating Development Cycles and Scalable, High-Performance On-Device AI with New Arm Lumex CSS Platform
- Desktop-Quality Ray-Traced Gaming and Intelligent AI Performance on Mobile with New Arm Mali G1-Ultra GPU