Do You Really Want Zero Test Costs?
Eliminating test, and thus its cost, might seem like a good strategy, but it will hurt in the long run.
As a test engineering consultant, I often receive calls from clients who want to reduce their test costs. Is this the correct goal and are their test expenditures really excessive? My clients think they want to transform the "expensive test" into a "low cost test." What they really want is satisfied customers receiving fault free products at the lowest possible cost. While test is a factor in the overall cost of delivering good products, so are the cost of repair and the penalty cost incurred from selling bad products.
Wouldn't you love to have no failures and produce the perfect product that would work the first time and every time? In that ideal world, you wouldn't need test and thus no test costs. Because we don't yet live in manufacturing utopia, "No Test" has its own cost in added repair and penalty costs.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- eUSB2V2.0 Controller + PHY IP
- I/O Library with LVDS in SkyWater 90nm
- 50G PON LDPC Encoder/Decoder
- UALink Controller
- RISC-V Debug & Trace IP
Related Blogs
- Do You Really Know RapidIO?
- CXL Controller with Zero Latency IDE: You Can't Do Better Than Zero
- Do you have the right 'connection'?
- Can you really value SoCs in dollars per square centimeter?
Latest Blogs
- Deploying StrongSwan on an Embedded FPGA Platform, IPsec/IKEv2 on Arty Z7 with PetaLinux and PQC
- The Rise of Physical AI: When Intelligence Enters the Real World
- Can Open-Source ISAs Catalyze Smart Manufacturing?
- The Future of AI is Modular: Why the SiFive-NVIDIA Milestone Matters
- Heterogeneous Multicore using Cadence IP