STOP! Are You Gambling On Your Memory IP?
Clive Maxfield, EETimes
3/3/2011 7:16 PM EST
Introduction
Kilopass and Sidense both license one-time programmable (OTP) memory intellectual property (IP). These companies are currently in litigation with each other with regard to allegations of patent infringement.
Why should you be interested? Well, if you are building a new chip and you are licensing memory IP, you really need to have a high level of confidence that the IP you are licensing does not violate someone else's patents; otherwise you might find yourself in court at some stage.
To be honest, the legal part of all of this is something of a morass that will make your brain ache and your eyes water, but there's a lot of other stuff here that I think you will find to be of interest, including the underlying technology, the back story as to how all of this came about, and the ins-and-outs of the patent and patent litigation process. So, keeping all of this in mind, let us plunge into the fray with gusto and abandon...
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- RVA23, Multi-cluster, Hypervisor and Android
- 64 bit RISC-V Multicore Processor with 2048-bit VLEN and AMM
- NPU IP Core for Mobile
- RISC-V AI Acceleration Platform - Scalable, standards-aligned soft chiplet IP
- H.264 Decoder
Related White Papers
- OTP for DCP Key Storage
- Antifuse memory IP fuels low-power designs
- OTP with a ROM Conversion Option Provides Flexibility and Cost Savings for On-Chip Microcode Storage
- Executive Opinion: Successful Memory IP Development Depends on GEP
Latest White Papers
- QiMeng: Fully Automated Hardware and Software Design for Processor Chip
- RISC-V source class riscv_asm_program_gen, the brain behind assembly instruction generator
- Concealable physical unclonable functions using vertical NAND flash memory
- Ramping Up Open-Source RISC-V Cores: Assessing the Energy Efficiency of Superscalar, Out-of-Order Execution
- Transition Fixes in 3nm Multi-Voltage SoC Design