Nanoscale chip verification: a massively analog problem?
Raul Camposano, President and CEO of Xoomsys
(11/05/2007 11:18 AM EST) -- EE Times
A while back, I moderated a panel entitled "The End of Traditional CMOS." This excellent discussion arrived at a somewhat optimistic conclusion: The rumors of the death of CMOS have been greatly exaggerated. The truth is, "simple" CMOS scaling has not been simple for a long time. Though it is getting harder, we have been dealing with new processes, materials, devices and circuits for decades, and we will continue to find appropriate process "enhancements." The trajectory of current manufacturing technology can reasonably be expected to get us to about 20 nm.
This brings us to the question, as "'traditional" CMOS manufacturing enables minimum geometries in the range of 10-100 nm, will "'traditional" CMOS verification enable us to deal with the manufacturing side effects that are found at these nanoscale depths? I submit to you that the answer is a resounding "No."
Each new technology node increases the number of available transistors geometrically; the time (and compute power) necessary to verify those transistors increases even faster. This by itself is not new. What is new (among other things, such as variability) is the increasingly analog nature of the problem: In the "good old days" of one-micron technology, interconnect hardly had to be considered for digital designs.
(11/05/2007 11:18 AM EST) -- EE Times
A while back, I moderated a panel entitled "The End of Traditional CMOS." This excellent discussion arrived at a somewhat optimistic conclusion: The rumors of the death of CMOS have been greatly exaggerated. The truth is, "simple" CMOS scaling has not been simple for a long time. Though it is getting harder, we have been dealing with new processes, materials, devices and circuits for decades, and we will continue to find appropriate process "enhancements." The trajectory of current manufacturing technology can reasonably be expected to get us to about 20 nm.
This brings us to the question, as "'traditional" CMOS manufacturing enables minimum geometries in the range of 10-100 nm, will "'traditional" CMOS verification enable us to deal with the manufacturing side effects that are found at these nanoscale depths? I submit to you that the answer is a resounding "No."
Each new technology node increases the number of available transistors geometrically; the time (and compute power) necessary to verify those transistors increases even faster. This by itself is not new. What is new (among other things, such as variability) is the increasingly analog nature of the problem: In the "good old days" of one-micron technology, interconnect hardly had to be considered for digital designs.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 5G-NTN Modem IP for Satellite User Terminals
- 14-bit 12.5MSPS SAR ADC - Tower 65nm
- 5G-Advanced Modem IP for Edge and IoT Applications
- TSN Ethernet Endpoint Controller 10Gbps
- 13ns High-Speed Comparator with no Hysteresis
Related News
- Cadence Unleashes ChipStack AI Super Agent, Pioneering a New Frontier in Chip Design and Verification
- SUNY College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering to develop Marcy Nanocenter site for 450mm computer chip manufacturing
- Breker Verification Systems Unleashes the SystemUVM Initiative to Empower UVM Engineering
- Imperas unifies new RISC-V verification ecosystem with RVVI
Latest News
- TES offers new High-Speed Comparator IPs for X-FAB XT018 - 0.18µm BCD-on-SOI technology.
- QuickLogic Reports Fiscal Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Results
- MIPS, GlobalFoundries Bet on Physical AI
- IPrium releases LunaNet AFS LDPC Encoder and Decoder for Lunar Navigation Satellite Systems
- Quintauris Introduces Altair: The Unified RISC-V Profile for Embedded Systems