Why do we need 450mm wafers?
May 2, 2013
This is a question often asked by journalists and others not directly involved in 450mm technology, and indeed was one of the questions that formed the basis of the SMART 2010/062 report Future Horizons produced for the European Commission.
It is also a question every new 450mm project has to answer in its funding request to the European Commission, and whilst working on the Bridge450 submission we realised the arguments have become rather unclear over time. The following gives some insight and clarity into the question.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
- LLM AI IP Core
- Post-Quantum Digital Signature IP Core
- Compact Embedded RISC-V Processor
- Power-OK Monitor
Related Blogs
- Do we need a new FPGA structure for prototyping?
- IP integration: what standards do we need?
- Do We Need Fab?
- Why the HMAC did we do this?
Latest Blogs
- Smarter ASICs and SoCs: Unlocking Real-World Connectivity with eFPGA and Data Converters
- RISC-V Takes First Step Toward International Standardization as ISO/IEC JTC1 Grants PAS Submitter Status
- Running Optimized PyTorch Models on Cadence DSPs with ExecuTorch
- PCIe 6.x: Synopsys IP Selected as First Gold System for Compliance Testing
- Post-quantum security in platform management: PQShield is ready for SPDM 1.4