Why Codasip Cares About Processor Verification - and Why you Should too
Finding a hardware bug in silicon has consequences. The severity of these consequences for the end user can depend on the use case. For the product manufacturer, fixing a bug once a design is in mass-production can incur a significant cost. Investing in processor verification is therefore fundamental to ensure quality. This is something we care passionately about at Codasip, here is why you should too.
Luckily for the semiconductor industry, there are statistically more bugs in software than in hardware, and in processors in particular. However, software can easily be upgraded over the air, directly in the end-products used by consumers. With hardware, on the other hand, this is not as straightforward and a hardware issue can have severe consequences. The quality of our deliverables, which will end up in real silicon, seriously matters.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 64 bit RISC-V Multicore Processor with 2048-bit VLEN and AMM
- RISC-V AI Acceleration Platform - Scalable, standards-aligned soft chiplet IP
- 32 bit RISC-V Multicore Processor with 256-bit VLEN and AMM
- All-In-One RISC-V NPU
- ISO26262 ASIL-B/D Compliant 32-bit RISC-V Core
Related Blogs
- 3 Reasons Why Verification Engineers should use Python instead of Perl
- Why and How to Customize a Processor
- Why You Should Create Your Own NPU Benchmarks
- Why your DL accelerator should be replaced
Latest Blogs
- lowRISC Tackles Post-Quantum Cryptography Challenges through Research Collaborations
- How to Solve the Size, Weight, Power and Cooling Challenge in Radar & Radio Frequency Modulation Classification
- Programmable Hardware Delivers 10,000X Improvement in Verification Speed over Software for Forward Error Correction
- The Integrated Design Challenge: Developing Chip, Software, and System in Unison
- Introducing Mi-V RV32 v4.0 Soft Processor: Enhanced RISC-V Power