Why Codasip Cares About Processor Verification - and Why you Should too
Finding a hardware bug in silicon has consequences. The severity of these consequences for the end user can depend on the use case. For the product manufacturer, fixing a bug once a design is in mass-production can incur a significant cost. Investing in processor verification is therefore fundamental to ensure quality. This is something we care passionately about at Codasip, here is why you should too.
Luckily for the semiconductor industry, there are statistically more bugs in software than in hardware, and in processors in particular. However, software can easily be upgraded over the air, directly in the end-products used by consumers. With hardware, on the other hand, this is not as straightforward and a hardware issue can have severe consequences. The quality of our deliverables, which will end up in real silicon, seriously matters.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIPI I3C Master RISC-V based subsystem
- ISO26262 ASIL-B/D Compliant 32-bit RISC-V Core
- RISC-V CPU IP
- RISC-V Vector Extension
- RISC-V Real-time Processor
Related Blogs
- 3 Reasons Why Verification Engineers should use Python instead of Perl
- Why and How to Customize a Processor
- Why You Should Create Your Own NPU Benchmarks
- Why Secure Boot is Your Network’s Best Friend (And What BlackTech Taught Us)
Latest Blogs
- The Growing Importance of PVT Monitoring for Silicon Lifecycle Management
- Unlock early software development for custom RISC-V designs with faster simulation
- HBM4 Boosts Memory Performance for AI Training
- Using AI to Accelerate Chip Design: Dynamic, Adaptive Flows
- Locking When Emulating Xtensa LX Multi-Core on a Xilinx FPGA