Why Codasip Cares About Processor Verification - and Why you Should too
Finding a hardware bug in silicon has consequences. The severity of these consequences for the end user can depend on the use case. For the product manufacturer, fixing a bug once a design is in mass-production can incur a significant cost. Investing in processor verification is therefore fundamental to ensure quality. This is something we care passionately about at Codasip, here is why you should too.
Luckily for the semiconductor industry, there are statistically more bugs in software than in hardware, and in processors in particular. However, software can easily be upgraded over the air, directly in the end-products used by consumers. With hardware, on the other hand, this is not as straightforward and a hardware issue can have severe consequences. The quality of our deliverables, which will end up in real silicon, seriously matters.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
- Compact Embedded RISC-V Processor
- Multi-core capable 64-bit RISC-V CPU with vector extensions
- 64 bit RISC-V Multicore Processor with 2048-bit VLEN and AMM
- RISC-V AI Acceleration Platform - Scalable, standards-aligned soft chiplet IP
Related Blogs
- 3 Reasons Why Verification Engineers should use Python instead of Perl
- Why and How to Customize a Processor
- Why You Should Create Your Own NPU Benchmarks
- Why your DL accelerator should be replaced
Latest Blogs
- ML-DSA explained: Quantum-Safe digital Signatures for secure embedded Systems
- Efficiency Defines The Future Of Data Movement
- Why Standard-Cell Architecture Matters for Adaptable ASIC Designs
- ML-KEM explained: Quantum-safe Key Exchange for secure embedded Hardware
- Rivos Collaborates to Complete Secure Provisioning of Integrated OpenTitan Root of Trust During SoC Production