Why Codasip Cares About Processor Verification - and Why you Should too
Finding a hardware bug in silicon has consequences. The severity of these consequences for the end user can depend on the use case. For the product manufacturer, fixing a bug once a design is in mass-production can incur a significant cost. Investing in processor verification is therefore fundamental to ensure quality. This is something we care passionately about at Codasip, here is why you should too.
Luckily for the semiconductor industry, there are statistically more bugs in software than in hardware, and in processors in particular. However, software can easily be upgraded over the air, directly in the end-products used by consumers. With hardware, on the other hand, this is not as straightforward and a hardware issue can have severe consequences. The quality of our deliverables, which will end up in real silicon, seriously matters.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- All-In-One RISC-V NPU
- ISO26262 ASIL-B/D Compliant 32-bit RISC-V Core
- RISC-V CPU IP
- Data Movement Engine - Best in class multi-core high-performance AI-enabled RISC-V Automotive CPU for ADAS, AVs and SDVs
- Low Power RISCV CPU IP
Related Blogs
- 3 Reasons Why Verification Engineers should use Python instead of Perl
- Why and How to Customize a Processor
- Why You Should Create Your Own NPU Benchmarks
- Why your DL accelerator should be replaced
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Extends Support for Automotive Solutions on Arm Zena Compute Subsystems
- The Role of GPU in AI: Tech Impact & Imagination Technologies
- Time-of-Flight Decoding with Tensilica Vision DSPs - AI's Role in ToF Decoding
- Synopsys Expands Collaboration with Arm to Accelerate the Automotive Industry’s Transformation to Software-Defined Vehicles
- Deep Robotics and Arm Power the Future of Autonomous Mobility