Verifying Processor Security, Part 2
This is the second post about Eli Singerman's keynote at the recent Jasper User Group. The first was Formally Verifying Processor Security. In the last couple of years, high-performance processors (not just Intel's) have been shown to be vulnerable to various side-channel attacks. These typically rely on using speculative execution to run code that should not be run, and then, despite the speculative execution being abandoned, some leak of data occurs. The first two such attacks were announced to the public at the start of last year with the names Spectre and Meltdown.
Eli is working on using formal approaches to prove that a future processor is immune to side-channel attacks, and also for analyzing the effects of mitigation on current processors (going back seven years). This is not just hardware that needs to be analyzed, but core firmware (in the processor itself) and other firmware (in devices like cameras and accelerators).
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
Related Blogs
- Formally Verifying Processor Security
- Upcoming IoT Security Legislation: Vulnerability Disclosure - Part 2
- ST-Ericsson (Part 2): Diverse Offering
- Intel vs. ARM: In the Smartphone Era (Part 2)
Latest Blogs
- ReRAM in Automotive SoCs: When Every Nanosecond Counts
- AndeSentry – Andes’ Security Platform
- Formally verifying AVX2 rejection sampling for ML-KEM
- Integrating PQC into StrongSwan: ML-KEM integration for IPsec/IKEv2
- Breaking the Bandwidth Barrier: Enabling Celestial AI’s Photonic Fabric™ with Custom ESD IP on TSMC’s 5nm Platform