Formally Verifying Processor Security
Intel has had a couple of major events that totally changed their attitude to verification. The first was in 1994 when they had the Pentium floating-point divide bug and management said “don’t ever let this happen again”. In 1996, they started proving properties of the Pentium processor FPU.
Then, a couple of years ago, the side-channel vulnerabilities like Spectre were discovered. These didn't just affect Intel, it turned out every modern CPU had the same problem hiding in plain view for 20 years. Basically, the vulnerability plays on speculative execution making memory references and then being able to discover which memory elements were accessed, even though the speculative execution got abandoned.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UFS 5.0 Host Controller IP
- PDM Receiver/PDM-to-PCM Converter
- Voltage and Temperature Sensor with integrated ADC - GlobalFoundries® 22FDX®
- 8MHz / 40MHz Pierce Oscillator - X-FAB XT018-0.18µm
- UCIe RX Interface
Related Blogs
- Verifying Processor Security, Part 2
- Formally verifying protocols
- Formally verifying AVX2 rejection sampling for ML-KEM
- what made Apple design the A4 processor?
Latest Blogs
- Satellite communications are no longer as secure as assumed
- Why Hardware Monitoring Needs Infrastructure, Not Just Sensors
- Why Post-Quantum Cryptography Doesn’t Replace Classical Cryptography
- The Silent Guardian of AI Compute - PUFrt Unifies Hardware Security and Memory Repair to Build the Trust Foundation for AI Factories
- Heterogeneous NPU Data Movement Tax: Intel's Own Slides Tell the Story