Licensing vs Productising
August 1, 2016
Licensing or products? This has been a dilemma for donkeys years in the semiconductor industry and Qualcomm is the most visible proponent of riding both horses today.
40 years ago it was RCA, King of the TV industry, which licensed TV technology to Japan and semiconductor process technology to Taiwan.
Licensing to Japan in the 70s was a $200-300 million business for RCA.
Then, as now, the licensing people held dark suspicions or the product people and vice versa.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- Post-Quantum ML-KEM IP Core
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Manager IP
- eDP 2.0 Verification IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
Related Blogs
- Open Source vs Commercial RISC-V Licensing Models
- The Semiconductor World vs TSMC vs EDA
- Intel vs. ARM : In the Smartphone Era (Part 1)
- Intel vs. ARM: In the Smartphone Era (Part 2)
Latest Blogs
- ML-KEM explained: Quantum-safe Key Exchange for secure embedded Hardware
- Rivos Collaborates to Complete Secure Provisioning of Integrated OpenTitan Root of Trust During SoC Production
- From GPUs to Memory Pools: Why AI Needs Compute Express Link (CXL)
- Verification of UALink (UAL) and Ultra Ethernet (UEC) Protocols for Scalable HPC/AI Networks using Synopsys VIP
- Enhancing PCIe6.0 Performance: Flit Sequence Numbers and Selective NAK Explained