The Semiconductor World vs TSMC vs EDA
September 3, 2009
In my previous blog on the EDA CEO panel at #46DAC, I was very disappointed to hear some of the smartest men in our industry agree that the only way to increase semiconductor design enablement (EDA) revenues is to increase overall semiconductor revenues. Talk about a complete lack of respect for the innovative people who support them, when in fact executives like themselves, and even themselves, continue to minimize this industry through irresponsible pricing practices (Smorgasbored Pricing), thoughtless litigation (CDNS vs AVNT, MENT vs CDNS, SNPS vs LAVA), and egocentric behavior, which results in a colossal failure of common sense.
Related Semiconductor IP
- SPI Controller IP- Master/ Slave, Parameterized FIFO, Avalon Bus
- SPI Slave IP transfers to/from a AMBA APB, AXI, or AHB Interconnect
- I2C Controller IP – Slave, Parameterized FIFO, Avalon Bus
- I2C Controller IP – Master, Parameterized FIFO, Avalon Bus
- I2C/SMBus Controller IP – Master / Slave, Parameterized FIFO, AXI/AHB/APB/Avalon Buses, SMBus Protocol
Related Blogs
- Should More Semiconductor, EDA Startups Look to Kickstarter?
- Special Report: Buying And Selling EDA Companies
- TSMC on Semiconductor IP Quality
- EDA: Not Like Semiconductor Equipment