The Semiconductor World vs TSMC vs EDA
September 3, 2009
In my previous blog on the EDA CEO panel at #46DAC, I was very disappointed to hear some of the smartest men in our industry agree that the only way to increase semiconductor design enablement (EDA) revenues is to increase overall semiconductor revenues. Talk about a complete lack of respect for the innovative people who support them, when in fact executives like themselves, and even themselves, continue to minimize this industry through irresponsible pricing practices (Smorgasbored Pricing), thoughtless litigation (CDNS vs AVNT, MENT vs CDNS, SNPS vs LAVA), and egocentric behavior, which results in a colossal failure of common sense.
Related Semiconductor IP
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
- MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
- ASIL B Compliant MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
Related Blogs
- Special Report: Buying And Selling EDA Companies
- TSMC on Semiconductor IP Quality
- EDA: Not Like Semiconductor Equipment
- Semiconductor, EDA Industries Maturing? Wally Disagrees
Latest Blogs
- IDS-Verify™: From Specification to Sign-Off – Automated CSR, Hardware Software Interface and CPU-Peripheral Interface Verification
- RISC-V and GPU Synergy in Practice: A Path Towards High-Performance SoCs from SpacemiT K3
- EDA AI Agents: Intelligent Automation in Semiconductor & PCB Design
- Why Security Can't Exist Without Trust
- Universal Browser Support for JPEG XL: Is Your Hardware Ready for the New Standard?