The Semiconductor World vs TSMC vs EDA
In my previous blog on the EDA CEO panel at #46DAC, I was very disappointed to hear some of the smartest men in our industry agree that the only way to increase semiconductor design enablement (EDA) revenues is to increase overall semiconductor revenues. Talk about a complete lack of respect for the innovative people who support them, when in fact executives like themselves, and even themselves, continue to minimize this industry through irresponsible pricing practices (Smorgasbored Pricing), thoughtless litigation (CDNS vs AVNT, MENT vs CDNS, SNPS vs LAVA), and egocentric behavior, which results in a colossal failure of common sense.
Related Semiconductor IP
- All Digital Fractional-N RF Frequency Synthesizer PLL in GlobalFoundries 22FDX
- Data Movement Engine - Best in class multi-core high-performance AI-enabled RISC-V Automotive CPU for ADAS, AVs and SDVs
- FlexNoC 5 Interconnect IP
- Controller for MIPI Soundwire
- RF I/O Pad Set and Discrete RF ESD Protection Components
Related Blogs
- Special Report: Buying And Selling EDA Companies
- TSMC on Semiconductor IP Quality
- EDA: Not Like Semiconductor Equipment
- Semiconductor, EDA Industries Maturing? Wally Disagrees
Latest Blogs
- From guesswork to guidance: Mastering processor co-design with Codasip Exploration Framework
- Enabling AI Innovation at The Far Edge
- Unleashing Leading On-Device AI Performance and Efficiency with New Arm C1 CPU Cluster
- The Perfect Solution for Local AI
- UA Link vs Interlaken: What you need to know about the right protocol for AI and HPC interconnect fabrics