Opinion: Why IDEs for hardware design fail
Hardware designers hate integrated development environments (IDEs), and they have good reasons to do so. Most EDA vendors build IDEs that lock the user in. They force a workflow on the user, limit the number EDA tools that work with their IDE, and provide half-baked usability. The only way to fix this is to stop using IDEs that are built by EDA (electronic design automation) companies. Electronic design engineers should start learning and copying from their colleagues in software engineering.
What are IDEs?
IDEs are graphical front ends that tie together all of the tools you need for developing software (or for designing hardware). The general look is pretty much the same for all IDEs. You have one or more windows with several views: an explorer that shows a list of files, a big editor view, navigation views, error views, and dozens more depending on the tools you are using. The idea is that you will never have to leave this IDE. It serves as a cockpit from where you can control every aspect of your work.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- NPU IP Core for Mobile
- NPU IP Core for Edge
- Specialized Video Processing NPU IP
- HYPERBUS™ Memory Controller
- AV1 Video Encoder IP
Related Blogs
- "Great" Hardware Design in a Wireless World
- Navigating the Era of Autonomous Design for Powerful Compute with Hardware
- Wi-Fi 7 (IEEE 802.11be) & MLO vs. Wi-Fi 6/6E (IEEE 802.11ax): What to Ask for Optimal Design Considerations
- Meet Synopsys.ai Copilot, Industry's First GenAI Capability for Chip Design
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Extends Support for Automotive Solutions on Arm Zena Compute Subsystems
- The Role of GPU in AI: Tech Impact & Imagination Technologies
- Time-of-Flight Decoding with Tensilica Vision DSPs - AI's Role in ToF Decoding
- Synopsys Expands Collaboration with Arm to Accelerate the Automotive Industry’s Transformation to Software-Defined Vehicles
- Deep Robotics and Arm Power the Future of Autonomous Mobility