Formal verification best practices: sign-off and wrap-up
Hi again, friends. Here we are. This is the last episode of our series on formal verification best practices. As the last step, let’s discuss signing off with formal verification, and wrap up. After our efforts using formal verification to verify our cache controller, we went beyond expectations. We reproduced and qualified the design fix for a known deadlock. We also verified data integrity and protocol compliance. However, we did all that without looking at the cache microarchitecture, therefore we don’t have any embedded assertions.
Now the questions are: Are we done? Is this verification sufficient? With a few tricks we were able to get proof convergences, but are we observing all possible bugs? We can typically answer these by looking at formal coverage.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIPI I3C Master RISC-V based subsystem
- ISO26262 ASIL-B/D Compliant 32-bit RISC-V Core
- RISC-V CPU IP
- RISC-V Vector Extension
- RISC-V Real-time Processor
Related Blogs
- Formal verification best practices to reach your targets
- Formal verification best practices: investigating a deadlock
- Formal verification best practices: towards end-to-end properties
- Formal verification best practices: checking data corruption
Latest Blogs
- Half of the Compute Shipped to Top Hyperscalers in 2025 will be Arm-based
- Industry's First Verification IP for Display Port Automotive Extensions (DP AE)
- IMG DXT GPU: A Game-Changer for Gaming Smartphones
- Rivos and Canonical partner to deliver scalable RISC-V solutions in Data Centers and enable an enterprise-grade Ubuntu experience across Rivos platforms
- ReRAM-Powered Edge AI: A Game-Changer for Energy Efficiency, Cost, and Security