Formal verification best practices: investigating a deadlock
September 26, 2023
In our first episode from last week we focused on best practices when setting up formal verification on a component. Our setup is now ready with protocol checkers to avoid unrealistic scenarios (which also helped find a new bug), and with basic abstractions to improve performances. It’s now time to tackle our real task: reproducing a deadlock bug found using simulation. Let’s dive deep into it.
Reproducing the deadlock bug
To ensure a design is deadlock free, one approach consists in verifying that it is “always eventually” able to respond to a request. The wording is important. Regardless of the current state and the number of cycles we must wait, in the future the design must respond.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UFS 5.0 Host Controller IP
- PDM Receiver/PDM-to-PCM Converter
- Voltage and Temperature Sensor with integrated ADC - GlobalFoundries® 22FDX®
- 8MHz / 40MHz Pierce Oscillator - X-FAB XT018-0.18µm
- UCIe RX Interface
Related Blogs
- Formal verification best practices to reach your targets
- Formal verification best practices: towards end-to-end properties
- Formal verification best practices: checking data corruption
- Formal verification best practices: sign-off and wrap-up
Latest Blogs
- Satellite communications are no longer as secure as assumed
- Why Hardware Monitoring Needs Infrastructure, Not Just Sensors
- Why Post-Quantum Cryptography Doesn’t Replace Classical Cryptography
- The Silent Guardian of AI Compute - PUFrt Unifies Hardware Security and Memory Repair to Build the Trust Foundation for AI Factories
- Heterogeneous NPU Data Movement Tax: Intel's Own Slides Tell the Story