Formal verification best practices: investigating a deadlock
In our first episode from last week we focused on best practices when setting up formal verification on a component. Our setup is now ready with protocol checkers to avoid unrealistic scenarios (which also helped find a new bug), and with basic abstractions to improve performances. It’s now time to tackle our real task: reproducing a deadlock bug found using simulation. Let’s dive deep into it.
Reproducing the deadlock bug
To ensure a design is deadlock free, one approach consists in verifying that it is “always eventually” able to respond to a request. The wording is important. Regardless of the current state and the number of cycles we must wait, in the future the design must respond.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Multi-channel, multi-rate Ethernet aggregator - 10G to 400G AX (e.g., AI)
- Multi-channel, multi-rate Ethernet aggregator - 10G to 800G DX
- 200G/400G/800G Ethernet PCS/FEC
- 50G/100G MAC/PCS/FEC
- 25G/10G/SGMII/ 1000BASE-X PCS and MAC
Related Blogs
- Formal verification best practices to reach your targets
- Formal verification best practices: towards end-to-end properties
- Formal verification best practices: checking data corruption
- Formal verification best practices: sign-off and wrap-up