DAC 2022 - Is it too risky not to adopt RISC-V?
I was fortunate enough to attend the 59th Design Automation Conference (DAC) in San Francisco last week. Aside from the Covid closure in 2020 I’ve been going to DAC since 1995. Many people, including me, arrived to the San Francisco with a bit of trepidation. After all, 58th DAC had low attendance and it was only ~7 months ago. What was the DAC 2022 conference going to be like? How would Covid affect things? Would international travelers come to San Francisco?
Frankly, I was impressed! Yes, the exhibit hall is smaller than it used to be. Yes, the attendance is not what it was in the 2000’s… and yes, there were times where it was quite slow on the exhibit floor. At the end of the day the many international travellers did show up and the conference and exhibits were quite well attended. At Codasip we met with customers and prospects from all over the world — Korea, Japan, Europe, the US, and more.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIPI I3C Master RISC-V based subsystem
- ISO26262 ASIL-B/D Compliant 32-bit RISC-V Core
- RISC-V CPU IP
- RISC-V Vector Extension
- RISC-V Real-time Processor
Related Blogs
- Embedded World 2022 - the RISC-V genie is out of the bottle
- How Arm is making it easier to build platforms that support Confidential Computing
- Generative AI is changing the world - but can it continue to succeed with our current data infrastructure?
- Migrating the CPU IP Development from MIPS to RISC-V Instruction Set Architecture
Latest Blogs
- The Growing Importance of PVT Monitoring for Silicon Lifecycle Management
- Unlock early software development for custom RISC-V designs with faster simulation
- HBM4 Boosts Memory Performance for AI Training
- Using AI to Accelerate Chip Design: Dynamic, Adaptive Flows
- Locking When Emulating Xtensa LX Multi-Core on a Xilinx FPGA