Developing an automotive electrical distribution system Part 1: System design
By Nigel Hughes, Mentor Graphics
February 21, 2007 - automotivedesignline.com
The electronic content of a modern car has become one of the key brand differentiators in the market place. Alongside the obvious problems in ensuring that the latest technologies are available to be included is making sure that the associated systems supporting deployment into the vehicle can be developed and integrated into the final production vehicle.
Any problems are compounded by the pressure of ever decreasing design cycle times. As can be seen from the graph below, cycles have now been reduced to between 24 and 18 months, with a clear goal for most OEMs to reduce this to 12 months by 2010. Within this cycle the electrical distribution system supporting the electronic content must be designed, validated, and deployed. Doing this is increasingly dependent on developing new processes and tools to support those processes.
In order to preserve a reasonable margin, automotive OEMs must also see that an appropriate return is gained from the technology, by specifying vehicle models with an appropriate set of options in order to support accurate pricing. Recently the market has witnessed a dramatic increase in the amount of optional content in vehicles. This trend pushes the need to make the latest technologies available, whilst ensuring basic car models are still available in an extremely price competitive market.
February 21, 2007 - automotivedesignline.com
The electronic content of a modern car has become one of the key brand differentiators in the market place. Alongside the obvious problems in ensuring that the latest technologies are available to be included is making sure that the associated systems supporting deployment into the vehicle can be developed and integrated into the final production vehicle.
Any problems are compounded by the pressure of ever decreasing design cycle times. As can be seen from the graph below, cycles have now been reduced to between 24 and 18 months, with a clear goal for most OEMs to reduce this to 12 months by 2010. Within this cycle the electrical distribution system supporting the electronic content must be designed, validated, and deployed. Doing this is increasingly dependent on developing new processes and tools to support those processes.
In order to preserve a reasonable margin, automotive OEMs must also see that an appropriate return is gained from the technology, by specifying vehicle models with an appropriate set of options in order to support accurate pricing. Recently the market has witnessed a dramatic increase in the amount of optional content in vehicles. This trend pushes the need to make the latest technologies available, whilst ensuring basic car models are still available in an extremely price competitive market.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
Related Articles
- Automotive System & Software Development Challenges - Part 1
- Providing memory system and compiler support for MPSoc designs: Memory Architectures (Part 1)
- Automotive System & Software Development Challenges - Part 2
- Providing memory system and compiler support for MPSoc designs: Compiler Support (Part 3)
Latest Articles
- ElfCore: A 28nm Neural Processor Enabling Dynamic Structured Sparse Training and Online Self-Supervised Learning with Activity-Dependent Weight Update
- A 14ns-Latency 9Gb/s 0.44mm² 62pJ/b Short-Blocklength LDPC Decoder ASIC in 22FDX
- Pipeline Stage Resolved Timing Characterization of FPGA and ASIC Implementations of a RISC V Processor
- Lyra: A Hardware-Accelerated RISC-V Verification Framework with Generative Model-Based Processor Fuzzing
- Leveraging FPGAs for Homomorphic Matrix-Vector Multiplication in Oblivious Message Retrieval