The politics of productivity
March 30, 2011
Politics and productivity seem to go hand-in-hand in semiconductor R&D organizations. Perhaps it's natural. No manager or project team wants the low productivity Scarlet Letter. So it's hardly surprising that ostensibly poor performers use politics to avoid scrutiny.
But are these so-called low productivity projects really poor performers? In fact, many are not. Quite the opposite in fact—they often have high productivity (although insufficient throughput) but are mistakenly pigeonholed because their crime was a missed schedule. Moreover, schedule overrun usually is not due to low productivity.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- eDP 2.0 Verification IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
- LLM AI IP Core
- Post-Quantum Digital Signature IP Core
- Compact Embedded RISC-V Processor
Related Blogs
- Throughput, not productivity, is what matters
- In search of best-in-class R&D organizations
- Semiconductor Growth from AI-Driven Design Productivity
- Falling IC development productivity means lost engineering jobs
Latest Blogs
- Enhancing PCIe6.0 Performance: Flit Sequence Numbers and Selective NAK Explained
- Smarter ASICs and SoCs: Unlocking Real-World Connectivity with eFPGA and Data Converters
- RISC-V Takes First Step Toward International Standardization as ISO/IEC JTC1 Grants PAS Submitter Status
- Running Optimized PyTorch Models on Cadence DSPs with ExecuTorch
- PCIe 6.x: Synopsys IP Selected as First Gold System for Compliance Testing