The politics of productivity
March 30, 2011
Politics and productivity seem to go hand-in-hand in semiconductor R&D organizations. Perhaps it's natural. No manager or project team wants the low productivity Scarlet Letter. So it's hardly surprising that ostensibly poor performers use politics to avoid scrutiny.
But are these so-called low productivity projects really poor performers? In fact, many are not. Quite the opposite in fact—they often have high productivity (although insufficient throughput) but are mistakenly pigeonholed because their crime was a missed schedule. Moreover, schedule overrun usually is not due to low productivity.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UFS 5.0 Host Controller IP
- PDM Receiver/PDM-to-PCM Converter
- Voltage and Temperature Sensor with integrated ADC - GlobalFoundries® 22FDX®
- 8MHz / 40MHz Pierce Oscillator - X-FAB XT018-0.18µm
- UCIe RX Interface
Related Blogs
- Throughput, not productivity, is what matters
- In search of best-in-class R&D organizations
- Semiconductor Growth from AI-Driven Design Productivity
- Falling IC development productivity means lost engineering jobs
Latest Blogs
- Satellite communications are no longer as secure as assumed
- Why Hardware Monitoring Needs Infrastructure, Not Just Sensors
- Why Post-Quantum Cryptography Doesn’t Replace Classical Cryptography
- The Silent Guardian of AI Compute - PUFrt Unifies Hardware Security and Memory Repair to Build the Trust Foundation for AI Factories
- Heterogeneous NPU Data Movement Tax: Intel's Own Slides Tell the Story