The politics of productivity
March 30, 2011
Politics and productivity seem to go hand-in-hand in semiconductor R&D organizations. Perhaps it's natural. No manager or project team wants the low productivity Scarlet Letter. So it's hardly surprising that ostensibly poor performers use politics to avoid scrutiny.
But are these so-called low productivity projects really poor performers? In fact, many are not. Quite the opposite in fact—they often have high productivity (although insufficient throughput) but are mistakenly pigeonholed because their crime was a missed schedule. Moreover, schedule overrun usually is not due to low productivity.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Bluetooth Low Energy 6.0 Digital IP
- Flash Memory LDPC Decoder IP Core
- SLM Signal Integrity Monitor
- 1.8V Capable GPIO on Samsung Foundry 4nm FinFET
- Bluetooth Low Energy 6.0 Scalable RF IP
Related Blogs
- Throughput, not productivity, is what matters
- In search of best-in-class R&D organizations
- Semiconductor Growth from AI-Driven Design Productivity
- Falling IC development productivity means lost engineering jobs
Latest Blogs
- MIPI: Powering the Future of Connected Devices
- ESD Protection for an High Voltage Tolerant Driver Circuit in 4nm FinFET Technology
- Designing the AI Factories: Unlocking Innovation with Intelligent IP
- Smarter SoC Design for Agile Teams and Tight Deadlines
- Automotive Reckoning: Industry Leaders Discuss the Race to Redefine Car Development