The politics of productivity
March 30, 2011
Politics and productivity seem to go hand-in-hand in semiconductor R&D organizations. Perhaps it's natural. No manager or project team wants the low productivity Scarlet Letter. So it's hardly surprising that ostensibly poor performers use politics to avoid scrutiny.
But are these so-called low productivity projects really poor performers? In fact, many are not. Quite the opposite in fact—they often have high productivity (although insufficient throughput) but are mistakenly pigeonholed because their crime was a missed schedule. Moreover, schedule overrun usually is not due to low productivity.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Rad-Hard GPIO, ODIO & LVDS in SkyWater 90nm
- 1.22V/1uA Reference voltage and current source
- 1.2V SLVS Transceiver in UMC 110nm
- Neuromorphic Processor IP
- Lossless & Lossy Frame Compression IP
Related Blogs
- Throughput, not productivity, is what matters
- In search of best-in-class R&D organizations
- Semiconductor Growth from AI-Driven Design Productivity
- Falling IC development productivity means lost engineering jobs
Latest Blogs
- MIPS P8700 RISC-V Processor for Advanced Functional Safety Systems
- Boost SoC Flexibility: 4 Design Tips for Memory Subsystems with Combo DDR3/4 Interfaces
- High Bandwidth Memory Evolution from First Generation HBM to the Latest HBM4
- Keeping Pace with CXL Specification Revisions
- Silicon-proven LVTS for 2nm: a new era of accuracy and integration in thermal monitoring