Moore's Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
A recent EE Times article covering IMEC's Luc van den Hove keynote talk at IEDM 2012 reports: "Chips made at the 14-nm process node may deliver as little as half the typical 30 percent performance increase â and still carry a hefty cost premium â due to the lack of next-generation lithography." Van den Hove provided the following slide photo as an illustration:
Yet, in another EE Times article about Intelâs 22nm IEDM presentation, EE Times quotes Mark Bohr of Intel as saying: "Projections from an IMEC keynote that 14-nm wafers will be 90 percent more expensive than 28-nm parts due to the lack of EUV lithography are inaccurate," The article also quotes Bohr as saying "The increase for 14-nm wafers at Intel is nowhere near that. Cost per wafer has always gone up marginally each generation, somewhat more so in recent generations, but thatâs more than offset by increases in transistor density so that the cost per transistor continues to go down at 14nm."
So who is right between those two giants?
Could it be that both of them are?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- Post-Quantum ML-KEM IP Core
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Manager IP
- eDP 2.0 Verification IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
Related Blogs
- 28 nm - The Last Node of Moore's Law
- Moore's Law good for 14nm, and probably, 10nm: Dr. Wally Rhines
- Moore’s Law and 40nm Yield
- Moore's Law and 28nm Yield
Latest Blogs
- ML-KEM explained: Quantum-safe Key Exchange for secure embedded Hardware
- Rivos Collaborates to Complete Secure Provisioning of Integrated OpenTitan Root of Trust During SoC Production
- From GPUs to Memory Pools: Why AI Needs Compute Express Link (CXL)
- Verification of UALink (UAL) and Ultra Ethernet (UEC) Protocols for Scalable HPC/AI Networks using Synopsys VIP
- Enhancing PCIe6.0 Performance: Flit Sequence Numbers and Selective NAK Explained