Functional Verification Basics: What's The Objective of End of Test?
End of test (EOT), is one of the most important and tricky parts of a test bench. EOT is important because it qualifies if a test has really passed or failed. Thus it potentially impacts all tests. However, EOT is tricky because the implementation is spread across all the components of a test bench. EOT has become more complicated due to self-checking nature of coverage driven constrained random verification environments.
Whenever EOT is discussed, emphasis is laid on the verification methodology’s support for “end of test” implementation. This is not sufficient. One needs to also understand what objective is the EOT check attempting to attain. This blog focuses on describing these objectives of the EOT.
In order to declare “end of test”, the following two objectives have to be met:
- End of Stimulus Generation: Ensure all specified stimulus has been generated
- End of Stimulus Execution: Ensure all generated stimulus has been executed or processed
In this blog we describe these two objectives in detail.
Related Semiconductor IP
- Narrow band - IoT Release-14 e-NodeB PHY. (L1) IP
- Narrow band - IoT Release-14 UE PHY. (L1) IP
- Narrow band - IoT Ultra-Low power UE RF Transceiver IP
- Narrow band - IoT Release-14 UE Protocol Stack (L2-L3) Software IP
- Narrow band - IoT Release-14 e-NodeB Protocol Stack (L2-L3) Software IP
Related Blogs
- Connected AI is More Than the Sum of its Parts
- Low-Power IC Design: What Is Required for Verification and Debug?
- Navigating the Complexity of Address Translation Verification in PCI Express 6.0
- With USB4 v2, Faster Speeds Is the Name of the Game
Latest Blogs
- ReRAM in Automotive SoCs: When Every Nanosecond Counts
- AndeSentry – Andes’ Security Platform
- Formally verifying AVX2 rejection sampling for ML-KEM
- Integrating PQC into StrongSwan: ML-KEM integration for IPsec/IKEv2
- Breaking the Bandwidth Barrier: Enabling Celestial AI’s Photonic Fabric™ with Custom ESD IP on TSMC’s 5nm Platform