Does an externally bought IP need re-verification?
Verification is never ending process! You can never be sure that you have verified everything. The aim of verification is risk reduction to the level of practical perfection.
The increase in chip complexity coupled with pressure to shorten time to market, are pushing chip design companies towards adoption of third party IPs. Let us consider you have weighed in all pros and cons of IP outsourcing and decided have to go for a third party IP for your next project. Then the question is - Does the externally bought IP need re-verification?
Let us answer this question by first examining the reasons that third party vendors may give you to persuade you not to go for re-verification:
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
Related Blogs
- ARM Cortex-A15 - does this processor IP core need a new category ... Superstar IP?
- How many people does it take to design an SoC? - Redux. Building brains with processors.
- Does your VIP need a GUI?
- Find Everything You Need to Build an Advanced PCI Express 4.0 Solution in One Booth - Visit Cadence at PCI-SIG DevCon 2015
Latest Blogs
- ReRAM in Automotive SoCs: When Every Nanosecond Counts
- AndeSentry – Andes’ Security Platform
- Formally verifying AVX2 rejection sampling for ML-KEM
- Integrating PQC into StrongSwan: ML-KEM integration for IPsec/IKEv2
- Breaking the Bandwidth Barrier: Enabling Celestial AI’s Photonic Fabric™ with Custom ESD IP on TSMC’s 5nm Platform