Chiplet Summit: Challenges of Chiplet-Based Designs
I wrote the first post, The Chiplet Summit, from the recent Chiplet Summit in San Jose, If you have not seen that, you should probably read it first.
A leitmotiv of the conference was:
Moore's Law is dead. All we have left is packaging.
As I said in the final summary paragraph of my earlier post:
The situation today is that single-company multi-chiplet designs are shipping in volume, tentative steps are being made with some chiplets to build ecosystems of partners around them, and the dream of a chiplet store is sufficiently far off as to remain a dream for the time being.
Today, I want to look at the technical issues that will require solutions to be able to do chiplet-based designs with chiplets from multiple companies who did not pre-plan making those specific chiplets work together. The analogy is how you can buy chips from different manufacturers and put them together on a PCB and have a working system, even though the companies that designed the chips never planned that specific system.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
- Parameterizable compact BCH codec
Related Blogs
- Cadence Sets the Gold Standard for UCIe Connectivity at Chiplet Summit '24
- Industry Leaders Discuss "Overcoming the Challenges of Multi-die Systems Verification"
- Industry Leaders Discuss "Overcoming the Challenges of Multi-die Systems Verification"
- Navigating the challenges of manual IP design migrations
Latest Blogs
- Formally verifying AVX2 rejection sampling for ML-KEM
- Integrating PQC into StrongSwan: ML-KEM integration for IPsec/IKEv2
- Breaking the Bandwidth Barrier: Enabling Celestial AI’s Photonic Fabric™ with Custom ESD IP on TSMC’s 5nm Platform
- What Does a GPU Have to Do With Automotive Security?
- Physical AI at the Edge: A New Chapter in Device Intelligence