Chiplet Summit: Challenges of Chiplet-Based Designs
I wrote the first post, The Chiplet Summit, from the recent Chiplet Summit in San Jose, If you have not seen that, you should probably read it first.
A leitmotiv of the conference was:
Moore's Law is dead. All we have left is packaging.
As I said in the final summary paragraph of my earlier post:
The situation today is that single-company multi-chiplet designs are shipping in volume, tentative steps are being made with some chiplets to build ecosystems of partners around them, and the dream of a chiplet store is sufficiently far off as to remain a dream for the time being.
Today, I want to look at the technical issues that will require solutions to be able to do chiplet-based designs with chiplets from multiple companies who did not pre-plan making those specific chiplets work together. The analogy is how you can buy chips from different manufacturers and put them together on a PCB and have a working system, even though the companies that designed the chips never planned that specific system.
Related Semiconductor IP
- AES GCM IP Core
- High Speed Ethernet Quad 10G to 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet Gen-2 Quad 100G PCS IP
- High Speed Ethernet 4/2/1-Lane 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet 2/4/8-Lane 200G/400G PCS
Related Blogs
- The Future of Silicon Innovation in the Chiplet Era
- Datapath Validation - Solving Verification Challenges in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Cores
- The Future of Chiplet Reliability
- Cadence Sets the Gold Standard for UCIe Connectivity at Chiplet Summit '24
Latest Blogs
- Why Choose Hard IP for Embedded FPGA in Aerospace and Defense Applications
- Migrating the CPU IP Development from MIPS to RISC-V Instruction Set Architecture
- Quintauris: Accelerating RISC-V Innovation for next-gen Hardware
- Say Goodbye to Limits and Hello to Freedom of Scalability in the MIPS P8700
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?