Opinion: The yin and yang of designing big chips
In thinking about this viewpoint, it occurred to me that a good place to start is with the EDA industry itself –– what characterizes it, for example? It strikes me that in EDA we are quite different as an industry compared to, say, the medical industry, especially in terms of speed of innovation. If a person in academia dreams up an EDA idea, it can be implemented, tested to ensure that it works, and put on the market reasonably quickly.
However, the proof needed to demonstrate that an EDA innovation works reliably is somewhat less rigorous than the testing and approvals process that medicine and medical technology needs to go through –– and with good reason. This is chiefly because the medical industry deals with people, which make the consequences of something going wrong far more serious.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
- MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
- ASIL B Compliant MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
Related Articles
- Bigger Chips, More IPs, and Mounting Challenges in Addressing the Growing Complexity of SoC Design
- Designing low-power multiprocessor chips
- Advantages and Challenges of Designing with Multiple Inferencing Chips
- Role of Embedded Systems and its future in Industrial Automation
Latest Articles
- RISC-V Functional Safety for Autonomous Automotive Systems: An Analytical Framework and Research Roadmap for ML-Assisted Certification
- Emulation-based System-on-Chip Security Verification: Challenges and Opportunities
- A 129FPS Full HD Real-Time Accelerator for 3D Gaussian Splatting
- SkipOPU: An FPGA-based Overlay Processor for Large Language Models with Dynamically Allocated Computation
- TensorPool: A 3D-Stacked 8.4TFLOPS/4.3W Many-Core Domain-Specific Processor for AI-Native Radio Access Networks