Designing low-power multiprocessor chips
Shinya Fujimoto, LSI Logic Corp.
(02/12/2007 9:00 AM EST), EE Times
Just 10 years ago, the challenge chip designers faced was to design logic blocks with as few gates as possible to fit all the functions in a target die size. Today, advancements in semiconductor process technologies let designers easily pack millions of gates and complex mixed-signal components into a single chip. Nonetheless, chip designers still face the challenge of reducing the number of gates and implementing efficient architectures--not only to reach a target size but also to reduce total system power consumption.
From cell phones to portable media players, more products in the market are battery-powered, and low power consumption obviously leads to longer battery life. In the consumer electronics market, even ac-powered devices can benefit from reduced power consumption. Lower power draw leads to lower system cost by enabling the use of less-expensive chip packaging and the reduction or elimination of heat-dissipation components (e.g., fans and heat sinks).
But the demand for higher performance and more features has only served to increase total system power consumption.
The challenge is to achieve higher integration and performance within the system power budget. To reach that goal, chip designers are moving away from single-processor architectures and toward architectures that distribute tasks among multiple processors or cores. The cores can be either symmetric or heterogeneous, depending on the application.
For systems that require the lowest power consumption and best cost/performance, chip designers prefer to use heterogeneous multicore architectures, with task-dedicated processors that operate concurrently.
Care and forethought are required when designing multiprocessor chips; otherwise, a design can easily get trapped into data bandwidth limitations that will limit system performance. Designers must architect chips to handle data transactions efficiently and to minimize the stall cycles as multiple masters access the external memory.
(02/12/2007 9:00 AM EST), EE Times
Just 10 years ago, the challenge chip designers faced was to design logic blocks with as few gates as possible to fit all the functions in a target die size. Today, advancements in semiconductor process technologies let designers easily pack millions of gates and complex mixed-signal components into a single chip. Nonetheless, chip designers still face the challenge of reducing the number of gates and implementing efficient architectures--not only to reach a target size but also to reduce total system power consumption.
From cell phones to portable media players, more products in the market are battery-powered, and low power consumption obviously leads to longer battery life. In the consumer electronics market, even ac-powered devices can benefit from reduced power consumption. Lower power draw leads to lower system cost by enabling the use of less-expensive chip packaging and the reduction or elimination of heat-dissipation components (e.g., fans and heat sinks).
But the demand for higher performance and more features has only served to increase total system power consumption.
The challenge is to achieve higher integration and performance within the system power budget. To reach that goal, chip designers are moving away from single-processor architectures and toward architectures that distribute tasks among multiple processors or cores. The cores can be either symmetric or heterogeneous, depending on the application.
For systems that require the lowest power consumption and best cost/performance, chip designers prefer to use heterogeneous multicore architectures, with task-dedicated processors that operate concurrently.
Care and forethought are required when designing multiprocessor chips; otherwise, a design can easily get trapped into data bandwidth limitations that will limit system performance. Designers must architect chips to handle data transactions efficiently and to minimize the stall cycles as multiple masters access the external memory.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
- Parameterizable compact BCH codec
Related Articles
- Designing Low Power Standard Cell Library With Improved Drive Granularity
- Opinion: The yin and yang of designing big chips
- Low power is everywhere
- An ESD efficient, Generic Low Power Wake up methodology in an SOC
Latest Articles
- A 14ns-Latency 9Gb/s 0.44mm² 62pJ/b Short-Blocklength LDPC Decoder ASIC in 22FDX
- Pipeline Stage Resolved Timing Characterization of FPGA and ASIC Implementations of a RISC V Processor
- Lyra: A Hardware-Accelerated RISC-V Verification Framework with Generative Model-Based Processor Fuzzing
- Leveraging FPGAs for Homomorphic Matrix-Vector Multiplication in Oblivious Message Retrieval
- Extending and Accelerating Inner Product Masking with Fault Detection via Instruction Set Extension