Timing closure in multi-level partitioned SoCs
Syed Shakir Iqbal , Mitul Soni & Gourav Kapoor (Freescale)
EDN (October 07, 2015)
With rising SoC design complexity, hierarchical backend design closure has become almost ubiquitous across the industry. Block and sub-block partitioning allow designers to exploit engineering and tool bandwidth more efficiently through optimized resource use. In addition, this approach is compatible with a bottom-to-top design approach.
This is in keeping with design practice wherein mature IP partitions are taken into the backend cycle while work is going on to finish the rest of the chip. Benefits like design-cycle reduction have prompted designers to push for multi-level partitioning schemes. However, as the level of hierarchical partitions increases, so do the challenges involved in their closure and signoff.
In this paper, we discuss the major timing and implementation challenges involved in multi-level hierarchical partitioning and modeling schemes.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- P1619 / 802.1ae (MACSec) GCM/XTS/CBC-AES Core
- LPDDR6/5X/5 Controller IP
- Post-Quantum ML-KEM IP Core
Related White Papers
- FPGA prototyping of complex SoCs: Partitioning and Timing Closure Challenges with Solutions
- Complex SoCs: Early Use of Physical Design Info Shortens Timing Closure
- Timing Closure on FPGAs
- Latches and timing closure: a mixed bag
Latest White Papers
- Multimodal Chip Physical Design Engineer Assistant
- Attack on a PUF-based Secure Binary Neural Network
- BBOPlace-Bench: Benchmarking Black-Box Optimization for Chip Placement
- FD-SOI: A Cyber-Resilient Substrate Against Laser Fault Injection—The Future Platform for Secure Automotive Electronics
- In-DRAM True Random Number Generation Using Simultaneous Multiple-Row Activation: An Experimental Study of Real DRAM Chips