Reducing cycle times for design rule checking
James Paris, Mentor Graphics Corp.
(07/31/2006 9:00 AM EDT), EE Times
Design rule checking (DRC) is the gold standard in the hand-off of IC designs to the manufacturer. From the beginning, when newly developed physical verification tools automated the manual check method, a DRC-clean design was the most accurate ticket to yield. Based on a compliance method of pass/no pass, the system was simple and straightforward, giving designers a faster method of sign-off and measurable assurance for successful silicon.
But at 130nm node, DRC-clean designs began failing first silicon. At that time, it became obvious that the compliance process required more than pass/no pass. This didn't mean DRC was no longer a valid process for sign-off; it did mean, however, that DRC would have to evolve. Robust verification tools began to do just that, managing design-for-manufacturing capabilities, such as antennae effects, stress effects, metal fill and via insertion.
But that was just the beginning of the evolution. For the upcoming nanometer nodes of 65nm and 45nm, the DRC engine is revving up for a whole new race.
(07/31/2006 9:00 AM EDT), EE Times
Design rule checking (DRC) is the gold standard in the hand-off of IC designs to the manufacturer. From the beginning, when newly developed physical verification tools automated the manual check method, a DRC-clean design was the most accurate ticket to yield. Based on a compliance method of pass/no pass, the system was simple and straightforward, giving designers a faster method of sign-off and measurable assurance for successful silicon.
But at 130nm node, DRC-clean designs began failing first silicon. At that time, it became obvious that the compliance process required more than pass/no pass. This didn't mean DRC was no longer a valid process for sign-off; it did mean, however, that DRC would have to evolve. Robust verification tools began to do just that, managing design-for-manufacturing capabilities, such as antennae effects, stress effects, metal fill and via insertion.
But that was just the beginning of the evolution. For the upcoming nanometer nodes of 65nm and 45nm, the DRC engine is revving up for a whole new race.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
Related Articles
- A Heuristic Approach to Fix Design Rule Check (DRC) Violations in ASIC Designs @7nm FinFET Technology
- Shift Left for More Efficient Block Design and Chip Integration
- Rising respins and need for re-evaluation of chip design strategies
- Open-Source Design of Heterogeneous SoCs for AI Acceleration: the PULP Platform Experience
Latest Articles
- ElfCore: A 28nm Neural Processor Enabling Dynamic Structured Sparse Training and Online Self-Supervised Learning with Activity-Dependent Weight Update
- A 14ns-Latency 9Gb/s 0.44mm² 62pJ/b Short-Blocklength LDPC Decoder ASIC in 22FDX
- Pipeline Stage Resolved Timing Characterization of FPGA and ASIC Implementations of a RISC V Processor
- Lyra: A Hardware-Accelerated RISC-V Verification Framework with Generative Model-Based Processor Fuzzing
- Leveraging FPGAs for Homomorphic Matrix-Vector Multiplication in Oblivious Message Retrieval