PCI Express verification underscores need to plan
Levent Caglar, Cadence Design Systems Inc.
(11/07/2005 10:00 AM EST)
EE Times
PCI Express-based designs are textbook examples of a complex verification problem. Using a compliance checklist can kick-start verification planning. But you also need a well-planned verification methodology that addresses these questions: What compliance items are verified? Have you covered all compliance scenarios? Can you provide a progress report to your manager?
These challenges are not new for verification engineers. But complex verification projects force the extended team to do more planning, to avoid getting lost in the 1,300+ item compliance checklist.
An extensive checklist can serve as a compliance verification plan to identify how to co-relate compliance items to the data automatically provided by the verification environment. This involves mapping English definitions to a mechanism. Often, we underestimate the workload and get confused between checking a single scenario and proving that a specific feature works in all scenarios.
(11/07/2005 10:00 AM EST)
EE Times
PCI Express-based designs are textbook examples of a complex verification problem. Using a compliance checklist can kick-start verification planning. But you also need a well-planned verification methodology that addresses these questions: What compliance items are verified? Have you covered all compliance scenarios? Can you provide a progress report to your manager?
These challenges are not new for verification engineers. But complex verification projects force the extended team to do more planning, to avoid getting lost in the 1,300+ item compliance checklist.
An extensive checklist can serve as a compliance verification plan to identify how to co-relate compliance items to the data automatically provided by the verification environment. This involves mapping English definitions to a mechanism. Often, we underestimate the workload and get confused between checking a single scenario and proving that a specific feature works in all scenarios.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
Related Articles
- PCI Express 3.0 needs reliable timing design
- PCI Express 3.0 needs reliable timing design
- Automotive Design Needs Efficient Verification to Survive
- How HyperTransport and PCI Express complement each other
Latest Articles
- ElfCore: A 28nm Neural Processor Enabling Dynamic Structured Sparse Training and Online Self-Supervised Learning with Activity-Dependent Weight Update
- A 14ns-Latency 9Gb/s 0.44mm² 62pJ/b Short-Blocklength LDPC Decoder ASIC in 22FDX
- Pipeline Stage Resolved Timing Characterization of FPGA and ASIC Implementations of a RISC V Processor
- Lyra: A Hardware-Accelerated RISC-V Verification Framework with Generative Model-Based Processor Fuzzing
- Leveraging FPGAs for Homomorphic Matrix-Vector Multiplication in Oblivious Message Retrieval