Using customizable MCUs to bridge the gap between dedicated SoC ASSPs, ASICs and FPGAs: Part 1
Jun 13 2007 (18:15 PM), Embedded.com
Custom ASICs always offer the best performance, power consumption, security and unit cost of any silicon-based solution. Cell-based ASICs provide the best characteristics because the poly and diffusion layers for interconnect, and transistors can be sized to optimize speed, density, and power dissipation according to each particular cell's requirements.
This approach provides for a silicon-efficient design, but is expensive because it requires a full mask set. Mask costs increase sharply with shrinking process technology or feature size.
Indeed, the $250,000+ cost of a full 130 nm mask set and the lengthy design time associated with standard cell ASICs puts them out of reach for many products. In fact, in applications such as MP3 players or cell phones, the technology evolves so rapidly that the next generation product must be launched every six months -- about half the time required to implement a cell-based ASIC.
Related Semiconductor IP
- AES GCM IP Core
- High Speed Ethernet Quad 10G to 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet Gen-2 Quad 100G PCS IP
- High Speed Ethernet 4/2/1-Lane 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet 2/4/8-Lane 200G/400G PCS
Related White Papers
- Bridging the gap between custom ASICs and ARM-based MCUs
- Paving the way for the next generation of audio codec for True Wireless Stereo (TWS) applications - PART 5 : Cutting time to market in a safe and timely manner
- Using PSS and UVM Register Models to Verify SoC Integration
- NoCs and the transition to multi-die systems using chiplets
Latest White Papers
- New Realities Demand a New Approach to System Verification and Validation
- How silicon and circuit optimizations help FPGAs offer lower size, power and cost in video bridging applications
- Sustainable Hardware Specialization
- PCIe IP With Enhanced Security For The Automotive Market
- Top 5 Reasons why CPU is the Best Processor for AI Inference