Stretching the Dynamic Range of ADCs - A case study
Robert Fifield, RFEL
EETimes (10/9/2012 10:26 AM EDT)
Whether your application is focused on wireless communications or instrumentation, the performance bottleneck is often the dynamic range of the analog-to-digital converter (ADC). Dynamic range is often a key parameter within signal processing systems and a shortfall can limit the quality and range of signals that can be received. The technical progress made on improving this gateway between the analog and digital world has not kept pace with Moore’s law[1] because the challenges are more fundamental than simply reducing transistor sizes. Methods to increase ADC dynamic range are always of interest although each solution often suits particular applications.
As an example of pushing ADC dynamic range beyond what is currently available, the engineers at RFEL were confronted with an application where a customer required an analog-to-digital conversion with a 74dB dynamic range at 800MSPS. Most available ADCs at this rate were typically 52dB, i.e. 8.3 effective number of bits[2] (ENOB). This represented a significant 22dB shortfall, which had to be resolved for the project to be feasible.
Various techniques for extending dynamic range were considered taking into account their advantages and disadvantages:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- ADC
- 11 Bit 100 kS/s Ultra-Low Power SAR ADC on GlobalFoundries 22FDSOI
- Ultra-Low-Power 6-13 Bit 1-10 kS/s 1.9 µW SAR ADC on XFAB XT018
- 7 Bit 6 GS/s Folding ADC on Fujitsu 55 nm CS250L
- 12-bit 2GSPS Time Interleaved ADC
Related White Papers
- Inside HDR10: A technical exploration of High Dynamic Range
- Variable-integration-time image sensor for wide dynamic range
- New Applications Areas Driving Higher Dynamic Range Converters
- The Future Of Chip Design
Latest White Papers
- e-GPU: An Open-Source and Configurable RISC-V Graphic Processing Unit for TinyAI Applications
- How to design secure SoCs, Part II: Key Management
- Seven Key Advantages of Implementing eFPGA with Soft IP vs. Hard IP
- Hardware vs. Software Implementation of Warp-Level Features in Vortex RISC-V GPU
- Data Movement Is the Energy Bottleneck of Today’s SoCs