Commentary: Models hold value, not IP
Mitch Dale, Calypto Design Systems Inc.
(01/26/2007 2:54 PM EST), EE Times
While the intrinsic value of intellectual property (IP) is rooted in its functionality, it is the model that holds all practical value. Likewise, it is the model that generates most of the expense. The cost to develop, verify, maintain and support IP models is equal to that of designing an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC).
The trouble with models is that they come in all shapes and sizes, and there is no one shape that fits all needs. For a given IP core, there may be a high-level reference model, a cycle or transaction accurate system-level model used for software development and system architectural analysis.
Chances are, there's a register transfer level (RTL) model for implementation and multiple gate-level netlists optimized for various technologies. Depending on customer requirements, the provider may also supply models in multiple design languages and with interfaces. Very quickly, the effort of revision control and quality assurance dwarfs the cost of IP innovation.
(01/26/2007 2:54 PM EST), EE Times
While the intrinsic value of intellectual property (IP) is rooted in its functionality, it is the model that holds all practical value. Likewise, it is the model that generates most of the expense. The cost to develop, verify, maintain and support IP models is equal to that of designing an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC).
The trouble with models is that they come in all shapes and sizes, and there is no one shape that fits all needs. For a given IP core, there may be a high-level reference model, a cycle or transaction accurate system-level model used for software development and system architectural analysis.
Chances are, there's a register transfer level (RTL) model for implementation and multiple gate-level netlists optimized for various technologies. Depending on customer requirements, the provider may also supply models in multiple design languages and with interfaces. Very quickly, the effort of revision control and quality assurance dwarfs the cost of IP innovation.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
Related News
- Commentary / Analysis: Real men have fabs, but maybe not Infineon, NXP, TI and ST.
- MOSAID Provides Update on Value-Enhancing Process and Urges Shareholders Not To Tender To Inadequate Wi-LAN Takeover Bid
- ON Semiconductor to Acquire AMIS Holdings in an All-Stock Transaction Valued at Approximately $915 Million
- New Silicon Value Announces New Business Model For Fabless Semiconductor Start-Ups
Latest News
- Weebit Nano secures a license agreement with Texas Instruments
- Digital Blocks DB9000 Display Controller IP Core Family Extends Leadership in 8K, Automotive, Medical, Aerospace, and Industrial SoC Designs
- AI Directs UFS Advancement
- Qualitas Semiconductor Expands Automotive Momentum with 5nm IP Bundle Agreement
- Cyient Semiconductors Acquires Majority Stake in Kinetic Technologies to Drive Custom Power IC Leadership for Edge AI and High-Performance Compute Markets