Commentary / Analysis: Real men have fabs, but maybe not Infineon, NXP, TI and ST.
-- In the wake of the fab-lite strategies, possibly moving to fabless strategies, of NXP, Infineon, Texas Instruments and STMicroelectronics, the pros and cons of having a fab were listed during IFS2007 in London this week organised by analysts Future Horizons.
The first argument is the cost argment. Some say that, at $3bn, fabs are too expensive. But if you look at their cost in relation to the market size, their cost is the same.
A fab cost $40m in 1970 when the industry TAM was $2.4bn; they cost $330m in 1985 when the TAM was $21.5bn; they cost $3bn in 2005 when the TAM was $245bn. That’s a 14.1 per cent CAGR over 25 years fro both the market and the fab-cost. So there’s no change in cost.
“It’s just that you have to bet the company when you build a fab, and people have lost the stomach for betting the company”, said Future Horizons CEO, Malcolm Penn
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- CXL 3 Controller IP
- PCIe GEN6 PHY IP
- FPGA Proven PCIe Gen6 Controller IP
- Real-Time Microcontroller - Ultra-low latency control loops for real-time computing
- AI inference engine for real-time edge intelligence
Related News
- Analyst sours on Infineon, ST but touts ARM
- Real Countries Have Fabs
- Commentary: Why we don't have IP quality yet (by Larry Cooke, VSI)
- ASICs going but not gone, panel says
Latest News
- LDRA Joins Microchip’s Mi-V Ecosystem, Expanding Functional Safety and Security Support for the RISC-V® Architecture
- Europe takes a major step towards digital autonomy in supercomputing and AI with the launch of DARE project
- GUC Monthly Sales Report - February 2025
- Codasip selected to design a high-end RISC-V processor for the EU-funded DARE project
- Infineon brings RISC-V to the automotive industry and is first to announce an automotive RISC-V microcontroller family