Commentary / Analysis: Real men have fabs, but maybe not Infineon, NXP, TI and ST.
-- In the wake of the fab-lite strategies, possibly moving to fabless strategies, of NXP, Infineon, Texas Instruments and STMicroelectronics, the pros and cons of having a fab were listed during IFS2007 in London this week organised by analysts Future Horizons.
The first argument is the cost argment. Some say that, at $3bn, fabs are too expensive. But if you look at their cost in relation to the market size, their cost is the same.
A fab cost $40m in 1970 when the industry TAM was $2.4bn; they cost $330m in 1985 when the TAM was $21.5bn; they cost $3bn in 2005 when the TAM was $245bn. That’s a 14.1 per cent CAGR over 25 years fro both the market and the fab-cost. So there’s no change in cost.
“It’s just that you have to bet the company when you build a fab, and people have lost the stomach for betting the company”, said Future Horizons CEO, Malcolm Penn
Related Semiconductor IP
- RISC-V CPU IP
- AES GCM IP Core
- High Speed Ethernet Quad 10G to 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet Gen-2 Quad 100G PCS IP
- High Speed Ethernet 4/2/1-Lane 100G PCS
Related News
- Analyst sours on Infineon, ST but touts ARM
- Real Countries Have Fabs
- Commentary: Why we don't have IP quality yet (by Larry Cooke, VSI)
- ASICs going but not gone, panel says
Latest News
- HPC customer engages Sondrel for high end chip design
- PCI-SIG’s Al Yanes on PCIe 7.0, HPC, and the Future of Interconnects
- Ubitium Debuts First Universal RISC-V Processor to Enable AI at No Additional Cost, as It Raises $3.7M
- Cadence Unveils Arm-Based System Chiplet
- Frontgrade Gaisler Unveils GR716B, a New Standard in Space-Grade Microcontrollers