Commentary / Analysis: Real men have fabs, but maybe not Infineon, NXP, TI and ST.
-- In the wake of the fab-lite strategies, possibly moving to fabless strategies, of NXP, Infineon, Texas Instruments and STMicroelectronics, the pros and cons of having a fab were listed during IFS2007 in London this week organised by analysts Future Horizons.
The first argument is the cost argment. Some say that, at $3bn, fabs are too expensive. But if you look at their cost in relation to the market size, their cost is the same.
A fab cost $40m in 1970 when the industry TAM was $2.4bn; they cost $330m in 1985 when the TAM was $21.5bn; they cost $3bn in 2005 when the TAM was $245bn. That’s a 14.1 per cent CAGR over 25 years fro both the market and the fab-cost. So there’s no change in cost.
“It’s just that you have to bet the company when you build a fab, and people have lost the stomach for betting the company”, said Future Horizons CEO, Malcolm Penn
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Xtal Oscillator on TSMC CLN7FF
- Wide Range Programmable Integer PLL on UMC L65LL
- Wide Range Programmable Integer PLL on UMC L130EHS
- Wide Range Programmable Integer PLL on TSMC CLN90G-GT-LP
- Wide Range Programmable Integer PLL on TSMC CLN80GC
Related News
- Analyst sours on Infineon, ST but touts ARM
- Real Countries Have Fabs
- Commentary: Why we don't have IP quality yet (by Larry Cooke, VSI)
- ASICs going but not gone, panel says
Latest News
- RaiderChip NPU for LLM at the Edge supports DeepSeek-R1 reasoning models
- The world’s first open source security chip hits production with Google
- ZeroPoint Technologies Unveils Groundbreaking Compression Solution to Increase Foundational Model Addressable Memory by 50%
- Breker RISC-V SystemVIP Deployed across 15 Commercial RISC-V Projects for Advanced Core and SoC Verification
- AheadComputing Raises $21.5M Seed Round and Introduces Breakthrough Microprocessor Architecture Designed for Next Era of General-Purpose Computing