Commentary / Analysis: Real men have fabs, but maybe not Infineon, NXP, TI and ST.
-- In the wake of the fab-lite strategies, possibly moving to fabless strategies, of NXP, Infineon, Texas Instruments and STMicroelectronics, the pros and cons of having a fab were listed during IFS2007 in London this week organised by analysts Future Horizons.
The first argument is the cost argment. Some say that, at $3bn, fabs are too expensive. But if you look at their cost in relation to the market size, their cost is the same.
A fab cost $40m in 1970 when the industry TAM was $2.4bn; they cost $330m in 1985 when the TAM was $21.5bn; they cost $3bn in 2005 when the TAM was $245bn. That’s a 14.1 per cent CAGR over 25 years fro both the market and the fab-cost. So there’s no change in cost.
“It’s just that you have to bet the company when you build a fab, and people have lost the stomach for betting the company”, said Future Horizons CEO, Malcolm Penn
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Multi-channel, multi-rate Ethernet aggregator - 10G to 400G AX (e.g., AI)
- Multi-channel, multi-rate Ethernet aggregator - 10G to 800G DX
- 200G/400G/800G Ethernet PCS/FEC
- 50G/100G MAC/PCS/FEC
- 25G/10G/SGMII/ 1000BASE-X PCS and MAC
Related News
- Analyst sours on Infineon, ST but touts ARM
- Real Countries Have Fabs
- Commentary: Why we don't have IP quality yet (by Larry Cooke, VSI)
- ASICs going but not gone, panel says
Latest News
- How CXL 3.1 and PCIe 6.2 are Redefining Compute Efficiency
- Secure-IC at Computex 2025: Enabling Trust in AI, Chiplets, and Quantum-Ready Systems
- Automotive Industry Charts New Course with RISC-V
- Xiphera Partners with Siemens Cre8Ventures to Strengthen Automotive Security and Support EU Chips Act Sovereignty Goals
- NY CREATES and Fraunhofer Institute Announce Joint Development Agreement to Advance Memory Devices at the 300mm Wafer Scale