The HPC Bottlenecks of Amdahl's Other Law
As we discussed in our previous blog post, there is a sense of growing concern in the high-performance computing (HPC) space over successive generations of supercomputers that have continued to move further and further away from architectural balance between compute and memory resources. This is because compute performance has improved at significantly faster rates than memory and I/O subsystems.
Amdahl’s Rule of Thumb
Gene Amdahl, who gained fame for his seminal work on diminishing returns that became known as Amdahl’s Law, formulated a lesser known second principle that is sometimes referred to as ‘Amdahl’s Rule of Thumb’ or ‘Amdahl’s Other Law.’ This second principle addresses the importance of architectural balance and stipulates a 1:1:1 ratio of FLOPs to Memory Bandwidth to IO bandwidth. With an ideal target of one byte of memory needed per FLOP (matched by one byte of transfer over an external interface), Amdahl believed that computer systems could remain in balance.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
- ML-KEM Key Encapsulation & ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- P1619 / 802.1ae (MACSec) GCM/XTS/CBC-AES Core
Related Blogs
- UEC-LLR: The Future of Loss Recovery in Ethernet for AI and HPC
- Why You Need to Consider Energy Efficiency of Your HPC SoC Early On
- Ultra Ethernet Consortium Set to Enable Scaling of Networking Interconnects for AI and HPC
- DDR5 12.8Gbps MRDIMM IP: Powering the Future of AI, HPC, and Data Centers
Latest Blogs
- Why What Where DIFI and the new version 1.3
- ML-DSA explained: Quantum-Safe digital Signatures for secure embedded Systems
- Efficiency Defines The Future Of Data Movement
- Why Standard-Cell Architecture Matters for Adaptable ASIC Designs
- ML-KEM explained: Quantum-safe Key Exchange for secure embedded Hardware