Should The US Government Invest In Fab?
September 28, 2020
The semiconductor industry has always been good at extracting money from governments but the current efforts underway in the US to encourage government spending look a trifle flaky.
The SIA held a webinar earlier in the week which resurrected the arguments of yesteryear – e.g. foreign governments spending much more than the US government, cheaper labour in foreign countries, need for a level playing field etc etc.
It missed the key problems: Who in the US can fill a fab? Which US chip companies want US fab? Is the IDM model dead? Could companies share a fab? If so, is there any point building a fab operating on the foundry business model to compete with the giga-fabs of Samsung and TSMC?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Flexible Pixel Processor Video IP
- Bluetooth Low Energy 6.0 Digital IP
- Verification IP for Ultra Ethernet (UEC)
- MIPI SWI3S Manager Core IP
- Ultra-low power high dynamic range image sensor
Related Blogs
- Why Should Government And The Industry Help Intel?
- US pressures TSMC not to fab Huawei ICs
- TSMC "actively" mulling US fab
- RISC-V Summit US 2023: CHERI in full bloom!
Latest Blogs
- Accelerating RTL Design with Agentic AI: A Multi-Agent LLM-Driven Approach
- UEC-CBFC: Credit-Based Flow Control for Next-Gen Ethernet in AI and HPC
- RISC-V for Infrastructure: For Now, It’s All About the Developer
- Unlock Your AI Potential: A Deep Dive into BrainChip’s Akida™ Cloud
- Breaking the Silence: What Is SoundWire‑I3S and Why It Matters