Should The US Government Invest In Fab?
The semiconductor industry has always been good at extracting money from governments but the current efforts underway in the US to encourage government spending look a trifle flaky.
The SIA held a webinar earlier in the week which resurrected the arguments of yesteryear – e.g. foreign governments spending much more than the US government, cheaper labour in foreign countries, need for a level playing field etc etc.
It missed the key problems: Who in the US can fill a fab? Which US chip companies want US fab? Is the IDM model dead? Could companies share a fab? If so, is there any point building a fab operating on the foundry business model to compete with the giga-fabs of Samsung and TSMC?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- Parameterizable compact BCH codec
- 1G BASE-T Ethernet Verification IP
- Network-on-Chip (NoC)
- Microsecond Channel (MSC/MSC-Plus) Controller
Related Blogs
- Evolution of CXL PBR Switch in the CXL Fabric
- Why Should Government And The Industry Help Intel?
- US pressures TSMC not to fab Huawei ICs
- TSMC "actively" mulling US fab
Latest Blogs
- What Does a GPU Have to Do With Automotive Security?
- Physical AI at the Edge: A New Chapter in Device Intelligence
- Rivian’s autonomy breakthrough built with Arm: the compute foundation for the rise of physical AI
- AV1 Image File Format Specification Gets an Upgrade with AVIF v1.2.0
- Industry’s First End-to-End eUSB2V2 Demo for Edge AI and AI PCs at CES