Does EDA matter anymore?
Of course electronic design automation (EDA) matters! It's indispensible to chip design. However, the more important question is whether EDA is keeping pace with increasing IC design complexity. In most cases, the answer is no. Design complexity is increasing much faster than productivity. How do I know? Average develop team size continue to grow.
So where does that put EDA? Perhaps the best place to look is the Design Automation Conference held a few weeks ago in San Diego. The venerable 48-year-old show played host to nearly 200 vendors, staged myriad panel sessions and technical papers, and attracted thousands of attendees. But as far as I could tell there were no earth-shattering tool breakthroughs portending to reverse the tide. Maybe you saw something I missed—let me know. Naturally, vendors announced plenty of new products, many of which will undoubtedly boost productivity. But none are likely to obviate the need for ever-larger teams, which is the current prescription for declining relative-productivity.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
 - MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
 - P1619 / 802.1ae (MACSec) GCM/XTS/CBC-AES Core
 - LPDDR6/5X/5 Controller IP
 - Post-Quantum ML-KEM IP Core
 
Related Blogs
- What does Amazon's multiday cloud outage mean for EDA cloud services?
 - Will your multicore SoC hit the memory wall? Will the memory wall hit your SoC? Does it matter?
 - Does size matter? Understanding Wafer Size
 - The Apple A9 Samsung & TSMC Love Triangle Opera - Does it Matter?
 
Latest Blogs
- ML-DSA explained: Quantum-Safe digital Signatures for secure embedded Systems
 - Efficiency Defines The Future Of Data Movement
 - Why Standard-Cell Architecture Matters for Adaptable ASIC Designs
 - ML-KEM explained: Quantum-safe Key Exchange for secure embedded Hardware
 - Rivos Collaborates to Complete Secure Provisioning of Integrated OpenTitan Root of Trust During SoC Production