Always-On IoT - FDSOI's Always Better? What About Wafers? (Questions from Shanghai)
Mahesh Tirupattur, EVP at low-power SERDES pioneer Analog Bits lead off the panel discussion at the recent FD-SOI Forum in Shanghai with the assertion that for anything “always on” in IoT, FD-SOI’s always better. They had a great experience porting their SERDES IP to 28nm FD-SOI (which they detailed last spring – see the ppt here). The port from 28 bulk to 28 FDSOI took 2 1/2 months (vs. to FinFET, which took almost 6). Even without using body bias, they got performance up by around 15% and leakage down by about 30% (he added that with body bias, they could get five times that).
He compared porting to FD-SOI to playing high school ball, vs. a port to FinFET which is like competing in the Olympics. ESD was different, but not a big deal – you just need to “read the manual”. Heating? Nothing an engineer can’t resolve. For IoT, FinFETs are like using a cannon to shoot a mosquito, he quipped.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
- AGILEX 7 R-Tile Gen5 NVMe Host IP
- 100G PAM4 Serdes PHY - 14nm
- Bluetooth Low Energy Subsystem IP
- Multi-core capable 64-bit RISC-V CPU with vector extensions
Related Blogs
- How to Design to the "Always-on" IoT Imperative
- Lowering Energy Consumption in Always-on IoT Designs
- ST To Run 28nm FD-SOI NovaThor Next Week
- Can "Less than Moore" FDSOI provides better ROI for Mobile IC?
Latest Blogs
- The Hidden Threat in Analog IC Migration: Why Electromigration rules can make or break your next tapeout
- MIPI CCI over I3C: Faster Camera Control for SoC Architects
- aTENNuate: Real-Time Audio Denoising
- From guesswork to guidance: Mastering processor co-design with Codasip Exploration Framework
- Enabling AI Innovation at The Far Edge