Buy or Build an RTOS: Does it Matter for Medical Devices?
By Colin Walls, Mentor Graphics Embedded Systems Division
Perhaps the most interesting thing about working with embedded systems is variability. Each device has a unique hardware and software architecture and its own individual functionality. As a result, it's a difficult challenge to design software development tools and operating systems that accommodate the enormous range of requirements.
And during tough economic conditions, it can be unwise for developers to compromise their core competencies by outsourcing. Developers are however, more likely to outsource non-differentiated components that are available commercially (Figure 1 below).
 |
| Figure 1. As much as 30% of the design cycle is focused on non-differentiated activity. |
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- DeWarp IP
- 6-bit, 12 GSPS Flash ADC - GlobalFoundries 22nm
- LunaNet AFS LDPC Encoder and Decoder IP Core
- ReRAM NVM in DB HiTek 130nm BCD
- UFS 5.0 Host Controller IP
Related Articles
- Adopting An SOC-based Approach to Designing Handheld Medical Devices
- Technologist backs low-voltage CMOS for SoC devices
- Mobile Devices: RISC-Java blend powers cores
- Opto-electronics -> Quantum wells integrate optical devices
Latest Articles
- VolTune: A Fine-Grained Runtime Voltage Control Architecture for FPGA Systems
- A Lightweight High-Throughput Collective-Capable NoC for Large-Scale ML Accelerators
- Quantifying Uncertainty in FMEDA Safety Metrics: An Error Propagation Approach for Enhanced ASIC Verification
- SoK: From Silicon to Netlist and Beyond Two Decades of Hardware Reverse Engineering Research
- An FPGA-Based SoC Architecture with a RISC-V Controller for Energy-Efficient Temporal-Coding Spiking Neural Networks