Buy or Build an RTOS: Does it Matter for Medical Devices?
By Colin Walls, Mentor Graphics Embedded Systems Division
Perhaps the most interesting thing about working with embedded systems is variability. Each device has a unique hardware and software architecture and its own individual functionality. As a result, it's a difficult challenge to design software development tools and operating systems that accommodate the enormous range of requirements.
And during tough economic conditions, it can be unwise for developers to compromise their core competencies by outsourcing. Developers are however, more likely to outsource non-differentiated components that are available commercially (Figure 1 below).
 |
| Figure 1. As much as 30% of the design cycle is focused on non-differentiated activity. |
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Sine Wave Frequency Generator
- CAN XL Verification IP
- Rad-Hard GPIO, ODIO & LVDS in SkyWater 90nm
- 1.22V/1uA Reference voltage and current source
- 1.2V SLVS Transceiver in UMC 110nm
Related White Papers
- Adopting An SOC-based Approach to Designing Handheld Medical Devices
- Technologist backs low-voltage CMOS for SoC devices
- Mobile Devices: RISC-Java blend powers cores
- Opto-electronics -> Quantum wells integrate optical devices
Latest White Papers
- OmniSim: Simulating Hardware with C Speed and RTL Accuracy for High-Level Synthesis Designs
- Balancing Power and Performance With Task Dependencies in Multi-Core Systems
- LLM Inference with Codebook-based Q4X Quantization using the Llama.cpp Framework on RISC-V Vector CPUs
- PCIe 5.0: The universal high-speed interconnect for High Bandwidth and Low Latency Applications Design Challenges & Solutions
- Basilisk: A 34 mm2 End-to-End Open-Source 64-bit Linux-Capable RISC-V SoC in 130nm BiCMOS