In multicore SOC architectures, buses are a last resort
By Steve Leibson, Tensilica
EE Times (09/29/08, 12:01:00 AM EDT)
The one-processor system model that dominated electronic system design since 1971 is now thoroughly obsolete. Today's SOC designers readily accept the idea of using multiple processors in their complex systems to achieve design goals and use the terms "control plane" and "data plane" to describe how these various on-chip processors are used on the chip. These terms appeared during the Internet and networking boom. At first, they referred to the design of multiple-board networking systems but have now become universal and are suitable for describing many systems, such as audio- and video-encoding/decoding designs that must handle high-speed data and execute complex control algorithms. Processor I/O data rates are as important as computational performance in such systems.

EE Times (09/29/08, 12:01:00 AM EDT)
The one-processor system model that dominated electronic system design since 1971 is now thoroughly obsolete. Today's SOC designers readily accept the idea of using multiple processors in their complex systems to achieve design goals and use the terms "control plane" and "data plane" to describe how these various on-chip processors are used on the chip. These terms appeared during the Internet and networking boom. At first, they referred to the design of multiple-board networking systems but have now become universal and are suitable for describing many systems, such as audio- and video-encoding/decoding designs that must handle high-speed data and execute complex control algorithms. Processor I/O data rates are as important as computational performance in such systems.
The main processor bus is the sole data highway into and out of most processor cores. Because processors interact with other types of bus masters--including other processors and DMA controllers--and to support SOC architectures employing bus hierarchies, main processor buses feature sophisticated transaction protocols and arbitration mechanisms that enable such design complexity. These protocols and arbitration mechanisms usually require multi-cycle bus transactions that can slow system performance.

To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
Related Articles
- PLL Subsystem architectures for SoC design
- Optimizing Communication and Data Sharing in Multi-Core SoC Designs
- A RISC-V Multicore and GPU SoC Platform with a Qualifiable Software Stack for Safety Critical Systems
- SoCs: DSP World, Cores -> New DSP architectures work harder
Latest Articles
- ElfCore: A 28nm Neural Processor Enabling Dynamic Structured Sparse Training and Online Self-Supervised Learning with Activity-Dependent Weight Update
- A 14ns-Latency 9Gb/s 0.44mm² 62pJ/b Short-Blocklength LDPC Decoder ASIC in 22FDX
- Pipeline Stage Resolved Timing Characterization of FPGA and ASIC Implementations of a RISC V Processor
- Lyra: A Hardware-Accelerated RISC-V Verification Framework with Generative Model-Based Processor Fuzzing
- Leveraging FPGAs for Homomorphic Matrix-Vector Multiplication in Oblivious Message Retrieval