Reducing Power in Embedded Systems by Adding Hardware Accelerators
By Rodney Frazer, Altera
Embedded.com -- (04/09/08, 03:21:00 PM EDT)
The rule of thumb in embedded system design has been that adding hardware increases power demands. The careful use of hardware accelerators, however, inverts the rule: adding hardware can reduce power.
By analyzing algorithms and implementing appropriate accelerators in programmable logic, developers can increase a design's performance while reducing power consumption in an embedded computing system.
Test results show that accelerators extend tradeoff options from as much as 200-fold performance improvement for the same power to the same performance with a 90% power reduction.
Programmable logic has, somewhat undeservedly, maintained a reputation from its early history as being a power-hungry approach to logic design. The rules of thumb have been that power consumption in an integrated circuit is roughly proportional to the chip's area for a given process technology, and a design implemented in programmable logic tends to be larger than if implemented in hard-wired logic. But these two factors, although suggestive, are misleading.
Embedded.com -- (04/09/08, 03:21:00 PM EDT)
The rule of thumb in embedded system design has been that adding hardware increases power demands. The careful use of hardware accelerators, however, inverts the rule: adding hardware can reduce power.
By analyzing algorithms and implementing appropriate accelerators in programmable logic, developers can increase a design's performance while reducing power consumption in an embedded computing system.
Test results show that accelerators extend tradeoff options from as much as 200-fold performance improvement for the same power to the same performance with a 90% power reduction.
Programmable logic has, somewhat undeservedly, maintained a reputation from its early history as being a power-hungry approach to logic design. The rules of thumb have been that power consumption in an integrated circuit is roughly proportional to the chip's area for a given process technology, and a design implemented in programmable logic tends to be larger than if implemented in hard-wired logic. But these two factors, although suggestive, are misleading.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 50G PON LDPC Encoder/Decoder
- UALink Controller
- RISC-V Debug & Trace IP
- UALinkSec Security Module
- PUF-based Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) Solution
Related Articles
- H.264 Baseline Decoder With ADI Blackfin DSP and Hardware Accelerators
- H.264 Baseline Encoder with ADI Blackfin DSP and Hardware Accelerators
- Programmable accelerators: hardware performance with software flexibility
- A New Methodology for Hardware Software Co-verification
Latest Articles
- CD-PIM: A High-Bandwidth and Compute-Efficient LPDDR5-Based PIM for Low-Batch LLM Acceleration on Edge-Device
- The Quest for Reliable AI Accelerators: Cross-Layer Evaluation and Design Optimization
- Pipeline Automation Framework for Reusable High-throughput Network Applications on FPGA
- A Comprehensive Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) Solution based on Physical Unclonable Function (PUF)
- IMS: Intelligent Hardware Monitoring System for Secure SoCs